List of Trusted Honest binary options brokers: Regulated ...

Binary Options Reviews, Recommendations and Scams

Here you will find objective reviews of Forex and Binary Options trading products. I will recommend on the best ones, but will also warn you from scams, frauds, or just not good enough services.
[link]

[META] The Rules and their Entirety

These are the rules, everything that pertains to everyone who wishes to make any sort of interaction within this sub. Per the last META, clarity has been given in regards to bulk-type sales. Since EVERYTHING is here for you all to read, we expect there to be less issues with rule infractions and general confusion as to what’s acceptable, and what isn’t. We devote our time and energy for this sub to continuously never reach a balance amongst the users.
Our goal is to ensure the subreddit itself sticks around, along with trying to keep the userbase from being taken advantage of. Our rules make sense to some, and none to others but they serve a purpose. Regardless of how you feel, these are the rules and it is expected they be followed. At the time this post becomes visible, all of what’s listed below will be enforced as a hard rule, no more wrist slaps or babysitting.

Reporting Rules

Here are the Subreddit Reportable violations. Violating these rules will get you a ban.

Reddit Rules:

Reddit Rules regarding Firearms
No firearm sales. No Ammunition sales. No primers or gunpowder, as they are considered explosives.
No selling or distributing of files related to 3D printed firearms.
If you have no idea what this is referring to, please educate yourself before posting anything related to 3D printing files by reading up on them at the following websites:
Firearms: A Firearm is considered the serialized receiver or assembly of a working firearm. If you are unsure if an item is prohibited, contact the mods prior to posting it.
80% lowers and completion kits are not included in this prohibition as they are not firearms yet.
Bump-Stocks are considered Machine Guns by the ATF and are therefore prohibited from trading on the sub.
Binary Triggers, Cranks, and Rubber bands and other such items are not (currently) affected by this prohibition (unless Admins change their minds later).
Explosives & Hazmat: Gunpowder and Live Primers are considered as explosives and Hazardous Materials and are therefore prohibited from trade.
Ammunition: Reddit Admins use the ATF definition of ammunition which is as follows:
The term “Ammunition” means ammunition or cartridge cases, primers, bullets, or propellant powder designed for use in any firearm. The term shall not include (a) any shotgun shot or pellet not designed for use as the single, complete projectile load for one shotgun hull or casing, nor (b) any unloaded, non-metallic shotgun hull or casing not having a primer. 27 § 478.11
Brass and projectiles posted here will result in an immediate suspension by Reddit Admins, so if we find it first we will remove it.
Any violation of these above rules will result in a ban by us, or a site-wide suspension by Admins and their Anti-Evil goosesteppers.
Anyone attempting to skirt Reddit Rules will be given a 7 day ban on the first offense, a 30 day ban on the second offense, and a permaban thereafter due to the fact that Admins will use the bad behavior of a few to justify shutting down the sub for good.

Posting Rules:

This sub is for private sales only. Vendors must post in Gundeals or GunAccessoryVendors
Clarification on Vendor Rule: Don't include links to your business website, we are not a referral system, do your business on here. Please see the Reddit Self Promotion page for details on that. Reddit admins don't like you cutting in on their ad revenue. We do not support VENDORS, I.E. if you buy another company's products in bulk (such as Magpul), and just act as a distributoreseller, your business is not welcome here. That is /GunDeals territory. If you have an FFL, you cannot do business on here because are considered a firearm business, and cannot solicit any transactions involving firearms.
The limit on bulk sales/bulk items is 10, that means 10 of the same individual item can be posted for sale or trade. If you have 10 Geissele triggers, but only 4 are flat and 6 are curved, that will still count as 10, as they're the same branded trigger and likely purchased at the same time. If there are 3 OD Green items and 7 FDE that are otherwise the same item, that still count as 10. If you post 10 items of the same in one day, 10 the next, and 10 the following day after that, that will be viewed as vendor activity. To keep such things from happening, it will be limited to one sale of this type, per user, per week. The ONLY EXCEPTION to this rule is old magazines, as it is common for users to purge off part of their mag collection.
Please follow these rules when creating a listing: Prefix your title with the transaction type:
[WTS] - Want To Sell
[WTB] - Want To Buy
[WTT] - Want To Trade
[GIFT] - Gun It Forward Tactically
Suffix your title with your state (e.g. (GA) or (NY)). This will help incentivize local sales and could impact shipping costs. Also, it could affect legality of some items such as magazines and those accessories deemed as "assault weapon" parts by certain states.
Postings should all follow this general format as an example: "[WTS] M16A2 Carry Handle - $60 (VA)". If you do not list the price in the title, ensure that it is listed in the comments. Include a Dollar sign ($) or the bot will remove it.
Postings without a price value may be removed after a period of time. WTB posts require valid offering prices, and will be removed if they do not have one.
Postings with prices such as "$1 for the bot" or "$1,000,000 for the bot" that are intended to bypass our rules and automated removal system instead of posting a valid price, will be removed and a temporary ban will be issued immediately.
Postings without pictures will be removed immediately, unless these posts are WTB.
Do not post an item for sale if you do not have it in your possession at the time of posting. This includes an item you may have purchased elsewhere, you decided you don’t want it and it’s on its way to you, but it has yet to arrive. If you don’t have it, don’t post it.
If you post stock images of an item in your WTS/WTT post, that will result in a temp ban if it is your first time doing so, possibly permanent if done on multiple occasions. If you post images of someone else’s photos for “your” item, this will be viewed as scamming tactics and you will receive a permaban, immediately.
If you drop your price, use the Price Drop/NSFW Tag. If your items sell, use the Complete/Spoiler tag. Please don't delete the price of an item if it sells, because that can be used by people in the future to gauge what similar items may be worth.
If your post does not receive the traction you're wanting, refrain from reposting within a 24 hour time frame. You may repost after the 24 hours has passed, and a price drop is not required, but encouraged. Deleting your post and reposting afterwards is viewed as trying to evade this rule. It will be met with removal and a temp ban, possibly longer if done more than once.
Want to Buy/Sell/Trade (WTB/WTS/WTT): These transactions all require a price value for the item. If a listing does not include a price it may be removed and re-listed once it is in compliance. Giving an unrealistic price to avoid this rule will be treated as a rule violation. Examples of this are "WTB scope, $1" or "WTT Upper, $9999". Additionally, you must list what you are looking for in [WTT] posts. Fielding offers, testing the waters or any other post attempt to try and skirt this rule will result in the post being removed.
Gifting items forward: (GIFT) If you have small odds and ends that aren't worth much and the cost of shipping is prohibitive, you are allowed to offer items for free. The gifter is allowed to request compensation for shipping only, and can request a flair upgrade in the feedback thread for the transaction. If the receiver pays for shipping, they can also request a flair upgrade, but if they get the item for free, no flair upgrades for the recipient. Flair upgrades of this type are limited in order to avoid abuse, i.e. giving away 20 A2 grips in order to get +20 rep is not authorized.
Accounts with 5 or less flair (you must have at least 6) on GAFS are NOT eligible to participate in giveaways, due to users from other subs coming to win stuff without ever participating in GAFS, or GAFS users making multiple new burner accounts to enter giveaways.
New accounts (under 30 days of age) are not able to create WTS or WTT ads, nor should they offer things for sale in the comments of other peoples' posts. To prevent scams, new users can only post Want to Buy threads. If you want to attempt to bypass this account age requirement, you must be able to provide moderators evidence of a good trading history on another reputable online forum, such as Calgunner or AR15.com where you can show a longstanding history of positive trade feedback. If this is completed, moderators may provide an exception and allow WTS/WTT posts to be submitted by new users, with a warning caveat to any potential buyers to avoid using risky payment methods until the seller has had a chance to develop a positive trading reputation.
Any new accounts that utilize this subreddit that create names that are similar to a mods (i.e. sxbbzxro, sxbzxxro, subzxro, etc.) may be removed from participating here due to the possibility of confusing/having the ability to manipulate users into thinking they are in fact a mod.
Price Checks (PC): Because PC listings were abused by many to bypass the price rule, fish for "best offers", and otherwise snipe sales, they have been disabled after overwhelming support from the community.
We have a feedback system in place. The current month's flair thread is On the Sidebar, and is usually Stickied at the top as well. Check there for the specific directions. DO NOT create a thread for a sale that has already happened, or has happened in a different sub/website/forum etc. The Flair system is only for feedback for exchanges in /GAFS. Any attempts to game the flair system will be seen as an attempt to establish trust for scam purposes, and will be banned accordingly.
Law Enforcement: Be aware, we do not offer exemptions to any individuals who may have LE credentials. Due to the difficulty of verifying employment, possible job changes, leaving/termination from said job, etc. we treat all users as civilians. Any local and federal laws apply to all individuals who utilize this subreddit. Read up and stay up-to-date on these laws and regulations, you will be expected to know and abide by them. Failure to do so may lead to a ban.
External Sales:
NO LINKS to your external sales on TacSwap, eBay, Facebook, Armslist, Gunbroker, etc. Sales in multiple locations are allowed, but don't just provide a link to sale elsewhere. Make your listing here. The only caveat to these rules is to show a price point elsewhere if someone here has an item that is grossly overpriced, or is looking for an item.
This sub is not a "highest bid gets the item" format. There are also no lotteries for items i.e. 10 chances at $10 each to purchase a $75 flashlight with a random number generated to pick the winner.
High Value or Counterfeit Items:
To deter the sale of counterfeit products, any item that is serialized must have a picture of the serial. As firearms are not allowed for sale here, this shouldn't present a privacy issue to anyone. This policy covers items such as EOTechs, Aimpoints, Trijicons, etc. Along with this, if you're selling anything that's "new-in-box", you must unseal it and show the contents of said box/package.
No Stolen Property. If you are selling a knockoff item, indicate that fact. Items such as bipods, BUIS, flashlights, holsters, and scopes/optics are known to have some gray market options. KAC USMC Stamped Rear Sights are not stolen property and are allowed on here, unless another member can provide proof from a DoD source that they are in fact considered stolen government property.
All GAFS logos, icons, banners and visual content related to this subreddit, belong to the moderator team. Do not create/manufacture/produce items with this content onto itself. It is forbidden to profit off the GAFS name, unless discussed with the modteam in advance and given permission.

Shipping/Insurance Rules:

The official policy is for the mods to not get involved with issues regarding lost packages, provided that the parties can prove it was actually lost. If you feel like insurance should be added to your transaction, please take care to add that before finalizing terms.

General Rules:

WARNING: Be aware of all state and federal laws that apply to you and any parties involved in a firearms-related transaction. You are responsible for knowing and following the law. This Subreddit and its staff are in no way responsible for informing you of the law, but will make every effort to do so. As a buyer, be familiar with your state/county/city rules. As a seller, do not knowingly sell prohibited items to areas that have laws against your items, such as certain capacity magazines. Any person, buyer, or seller, who knowingly solicits a trade that is illegal for them may be subject to a ban.
Respect all federal and local laws for any transaction you take part in. This includes federal drug laws. Drug activity tied to your account tied to any other issues is sufficient grounds for banning. Here is the ATF Letter that explains why any suspected drug activity, including marijuana, is grounds for immediate banning from the sub. Illegal gun activity such as unregistered SBRs, AOWs, destructive devices, DIAS or lightning links in your reddit profile (in or outside the sub) can be reason for banning. Do not spread bad information regarding laws.
Any item you post for sale is expected to be in your current possession. If this is not the case, you must specify this in the listing. Circumstances such as selling for a friend is allowed, but pictures of your items are required to be shared to the public. You do not need an imgur.com account in order to host pictures of your item on imgur, so that is not an excuse.
If you are scammed, inform the mods as soon as you can so that we may investigate and ban the offending parties if necessary.
Do not post the personal information of any Reddit users. The exception to this is if someone uses PayPal to scam a member, this information may be sent to the mods to prevent others from also being scammed. Doxxing people will not be tolerated.
Do not antagonize posters about their price, opinion, or sexual orientation (etc). This translates to be a general rule of "no dickish behavior". If you disagree with someone's price, and can post evidence that their item has a current or recent better price elsewhere such as a link to a vendor, that information is authorized to be posted. That is not antagonism. People may comment on prices and offer counter-offers, as long as behavior is not insulting or unprofessional. If you feel that someone is being unprofessional regarding pricing, report it and the mods will evaluate the case. They are the determining factor whether behavior warrants muting, temporary banning, or permanent banning based on severity of incident, past behavior, and other factors. If your behavior does not contribute towards the positive image of firearms ownership, your participation in this subreddit may not be welcome.
Soliciting any type of transaction regarding prohibited items may result in a ban. This includes Price Checks of firearms and other prohibited items, as this can be seen as an attempt to garner PM offers for prohibited items. Remember that there is no expectation of privacy from Reddit Admins, and that they have shown in the past that they have access to private message histories.
As a general guideline, if a buyer wants to use PayPal Goods and Services (G&S) rather than Friends and family (F&F), it is expected that they will absorb the ~3% fee for the increased protections. However, PayPal F&F, Zelle, and Venmo and similar payment methods are discouraged here due to a lack of protections.
All rules and guidelines are subject to change. The moderators have the final say in all issues in relation to the rules and how to enforce them.
submitted by SxbZxro to GunAccessoriesForSale [link] [comments]

Reddcoin (RDD) 02/20 Progress Report - Core Wallet v3.1 Evolution & PoSV v2 - Commits & More Commits to v3.1! (Bitcoin Core 0.10, MacOS Catalina, QT Enhanced Speed and Security and more!)

Reddcoin (RDD) Core Dev Team Informal Progress Report, Feb 2020 - As any blockchain or software expert will confirm, the hardest part of making successful progress in blockchain and crypto is invisible to most users. As developers, the Reddcoin Core team relies on internal experts like John Nash, contributors offering their own code improvements to our repos (which we would love to see more of!) and especially upstream commits from experts working on open source projects like Bitcoin itself. We'd like tothank each and everyone who's hard work has contributed to this progress.
As part of Reddcoin's evolution, and in order to include required security fixes, speed improvements that are long overdue, the team has up to this point incorporated the following code commits since our last v3.0.1 public release. In attempting to solve the relatively minor font display issue with MacOS Catalina, we uncovered a complicated interweaving of updates between Reddcoin Core, QT software, MacOS SDK, Bitcoin Core and related libraries and dependencies that mandated we take a holistic approach to both solve the Catalina display problem, but in doing so, prepare a more streamlined overall build and test system, allowing the team to roll out more frequent and more secure updates in the future. And also to include some badly needed fixes in the current version of Core, which we have tentatively labeled Reddcoin Core Wallet v3.1.
Note: As indicated below, v3.1 is NOT YET AVAILABLE FOR DOWNLOAD BY PUBLIC. We wil advise when it is.
The new v3.1 version should be ready for internal QA and build testing by the end of this week, with luck, and will be turned over to the public shortly thereafter once testing has proven no unexpected issues have been introduced. We know the delay has been a bit extended for our ReddHead MacOS Catalina stakers, and we hope to have them all aboard soon. We have moved with all possible speed while attempting to incorproate all the required work, testing, and ensuring security and safety for our ReddHeads.
Which leads us to: PoSV v2 activation and the supermajority on Mainnet at the time of this writing has reached 5625/9000 blocks or 62.5%. We have progressed quite well and without any reported user issues since release, but we need all of the community to participate! This activation, much like the funding mechanisms currently being debated by BCH and others, and employed by DASH, will mean not only a catalyst for Reddcoin but ensure it's future by providing funding for the dev team. As a personal plea from the team, please help us support the PoSV v2 activation by staking your RDD, no matter how large or small your amount of stake.
Every block and every RDD counts, and if you don't know how, we'll teach you! Live chat is fun as well as providing tech support you can trust from devs and community ReddHead members. Join us today in staking and online and collect some RDD "rain" from users and devs alike!
If you're holding Reddcoin and not staking, or you haven't upgraded your v2.x wallet to v3.0.1 (current release), we need you to help achieve consensus and activate PoSV v2! For details, see the pinned message here or our website or medium channel. Upgrade is simple and takes moments; if you're nervous or unsure, we're here to help live in Telegram or Discord, as well as other chat programs. See our website for links.
Look for more updates shortly as our long-anticipated Reddcoin Payment Gateway and Merchant Services API come online with point-of-sale support, as we announce the cross-crypto-project Aussie firefighter fundraiser program, as well as a comprehensive update to our development roadmap and more.
Work has restarted on ReddID and multiple initiatives are underway to begin educating and sharing information about ReddID, what it is, and how to use it, as we approach a releasable ReddID product. We enthusiastically encourage anyone interested in working to bring these efforts to life, whether writers, UX/UI experts, big data analysts, graphic artists, coders, front-end, back-end, AI, DevOps, the Reddcoin Core dev team is growing, and there's more opportunity and work than ever!
Bring your talents to a community and dev team that truly appreciates it, and share the Reddcoin Love!
And now, lots of commits. As v3.1 is not yet quite ready for public release, these commits have not been pushed publicly, but in the interests of sharing progress transparently, and including our ReddHead community in the process, see below for mind-numbing technical detail of work accomplished.
e5c143404 - - 2014-08-07 - Ross Nicoll - Changed LevelDB cursors to use scoped pointers to ensure destruction when going out of scope. *99a7dba2e - - 2014-08-15 - Cory Fields - tests: fix test-runner for osx. Closes ##4708 *8c667f1be - - 2014-08-15 - Cory Fields - build: add funcs.mk to the list of meta-depends *bcc1b2b2f - - 2014-08-15 - Cory Fields - depends: fix shasum on osx < 10.9 *54dac77d1 - - 2014-08-18 - Cory Fields - build: add option for reducing exports (v2) *6fb9611c0 - - 2014-08-16 - randy-waterhouse - build : fix CPPFLAGS for libbitcoin_cli *9958cc923 - - 2014-08-16 - randy-waterhouse - build: Add --with-utils (bitcoin-cli and bitcoin-tx, default=yes). Help string consistency tweaks. Target sanity check fix. *342aa98ea - - 2014-08-07 - Cory Fields - build: fix automake warnings about the use of INCLUDES *46db8ad51 - - 2020-02-18 - John Nash - build: add build.h to the correct target *a24de1e4c - - 2014-11-26 - Pavel Janík - Use complete path to include bitcoin-config.h. *fd8f506e5 - - 2014-08-04 - Wladimir J. van der Laan - qt: Demote ReportInvalidCertificate message to qDebug *f12aaf3b1 - - 2020-02-17 - John Nash - build: QT5 compiled with fPIC require fPIC to be enabled, fPIE is not enough *7a991b37e - - 2014-08-12 - Wladimir J. van der Laan - build: check for sys/prctl.h in the proper way *2cfa63a48 - - 2014-08-11 - Wladimir J. van der Laan - build: Add mention of --disable-wallet to bdb48 error messages *9aa580f04 - - 2014-07-23 - Cory Fields - depends: add shared dependency builder *8853d4645 - - 2014-08-08 - Philip Kaufmann - [Qt] move SubstituteFonts() above ToolTipToRichTextFilter *0c98e21db - - 2014-08-02 - Ross Nicoll - URLs containing a / after the address no longer cause parsing errors. *7baa77731 - - 2014-08-07 - ntrgn - Fixes ignored qt 4.8 codecs path on windows when configuring with --with-qt-libdir *2a3df4617 - - 2014-08-06 - Cory Fields - qt: fix unicode character display on osx when building with 10.7 sdk *71a36303d - - 2014-08-04 - Cory Fields - build: fix race in 'make deploy' for windows *077295498 - - 2014-08-04 - Cory Fields - build: Fix 'make deploy' when binaries haven't been built yet *ffdcc4d7d - - 2014-08-04 - Cory Fields - build: hook up qt translations for static osx packaging *25a7e9c90 - - 2014-08-04 - Cory Fields - build: add --with-qt-translationdir to configure for use with static qt *11cfcef37 - - 2014-08-04 - Cory Fields - build: teach macdeploy the -translations-dir argument, for use with static qt *4c4ae35b1 - - 2014-07-23 - Cory Fields - build: Find the proper xcb/pcre dependencies *942e77dd2 - - 2014-08-06 - Cory Fields - build: silence mingw fpic warning spew *e73e2b834 - - 2014-06-27 - Huang Le - Use async name resolving to improve net thread responsiveness *c88e76e8e - - 2014-07-23 - Cory Fields - build: don't let libtool insert rpath into binaries *18e14e11c - - 2014-08-05 - ntrgn - build: Fix windows configure when using --with-qt-libdir *bb92d65c4 - - 2014-07-31 - Cory Fields - test: don't let the port number exceed the legal range *62b95290a - - 2014-06-18 - Cory Fields - test: redirect comparison tool output to stdout *cefe447e9 - - 2014-07-22 - Cory Fields - gitian: remove unneeded option after last commit *9347402ca - - 2014-07-21 - Cory Fields - build: fix broken boost chrono check on some platforms *c9ed039cf - - 2014-06-03 - Cory Fields - build: fix whitespace in pkg-config variable *3bcc5ad37 - - 2014-06-03 - Cory Fields - build: allow linux and osx to build against static qt5 *01a44ba90 - - 2014-07-17 - Cory Fields - build: silence false errors during make clean *d1fbf7ba2 - - 2014-07-08 - Cory Fields - build: fix win32 static linking after libtool merge *005ae2fa4 - - 2014-07-08 - Cory Fields - build: re-add AM_LDFLAGS where it's overridden *37043076d - - 2014-07-02 - Wladimir J. van der Laan - Fix the Qt5 build after d95ba75 *f3b4bbf40 - - 2014-07-01 - Wladimir J. van der Laan - qt: Change serious messages from qDebug to qWarning *f4706f753 - - 2014-07-01 - Wladimir J. van der Laan - qt: Log messages with type>QtDebugMsg as non-debug *98e85fa1f - - 2014-06-06 - Pieter Wuille - libsecp256k1 integration *5f1f2e226 - - 2020-02-17 - John Nash - Merge branch 'switch_verification_code' into Build *1f30416c9 - - 2014-02-07 - Pieter Wuille - Also switch the (unused) verification code to low-s instead of even-s. *1c093d55e - - 2014-06-06 - Cory Fields - secp256k1: Add build-side changes for libsecp256k1 *7f3114484 - - 2014-06-06 - Cory Fields - secp256k1: add libtool as a dependency *2531f9299 - - 2020-02-17 - John Nash - Move network-time related functions to timedata.cpp/h *d003e4c57 - - 2020-02-16 - John Nash - build: fix build weirdness after 54372482. *7035f5034 - - 2020-02-16 - John Nash - Add ::OUTPUT_SIZE *2a864c4d8 - - 2014-06-09 - Cory Fields - crypto: create a separate lib for crypto functions *03a4e4c70 - - 2014-06-09 - Cory Fields - crypto: explicitly check for byte read/write functions *a78462a2a - - 2014-06-09 - Cory Fields - build: move bitcoin-config.h to its own directory *a885721c4 - - 2014-05-31 - Pieter Wuille - Extend and move all crypto tests to crypto_tests.cpp *5f308f528 - - 2014-05-03 - Pieter Wuille - Move {Read,Write}{LE,BE}{32,64} to common.h and use builtins if possible *0161cc426 - - 2014-05-01 - Pieter Wuille - Add built-in RIPEMD-160 implementation *deefc27c0 - - 2014-04-28 - Pieter Wuille - Move crypto implementations to src/crypto/ *d6a12182b - - 2014-04-28 - Pieter Wuille - Add built-in SHA-1 implementation. *c3c4f9f2e - - 2014-04-27 - Pieter Wuille - Switch miner.cpp to use sha2 instead of OpenSSL. *b6ed6def9 - - 2014-04-28 - Pieter Wuille - Remove getwork() RPC call *0a09c1c60 - - 2014-04-26 - Pieter Wuille - Switch script.cpp and hash.cpp to use sha2.cpp instead of OpenSSL. *8ed091692 - - 2014-04-20 - Pieter Wuille - Add a built-in SHA256/SHA512 implementation. *0c4c99b3f - - 2014-06-21 - Philip Kaufmann - small cleanup in src/compat .h and .cpp *ab1369745 - - 2014-06-13 - Cory Fields - sanity: hook up sanity checks *f598c67e0 - - 2014-06-13 - Cory Fields - sanity: add libc/stdlib sanity checks *b241b3e13 - - 2014-06-13 - Cory Fields - sanity: autoconf check for sys/select.h *cad980a4f - - 2019-07-03 - John Nash - build: Add a top-level forwarding target for src/ objects *f4533ee1c - - 2019-07-03 - John Nash - build: qt: split locale resources. Fixes non-deterministic distcheck *4a0e46e76 - - 2019-06-29 - John Nash - build: fix version dependency *2f61699d9 - - 2019-06-29 - John Nash - build: quit abusing AMCPPFLAGS *99b60ba49 - - 2019-06-29 - John Nash - build: avoid the use of top and abs_ dir paths *c8f673d5d - - 2019-06-29 - John Nash - build: Tidy up file generation output *5318bce57 - - 2019-06-29 - John Nash - build: nuke Makefile.include from orbit *672a25349 - - 2019-06-29 - John Nash - build: add stub makefiles for easier subdir builds *562b7c5a6 - - 2020-02-08 - John Nash - build: delete old Makefile.am's *066120079 - - 2020-02-08 - John Nash - build: Switch to non-recursive make
Whew! No wonder it's taken the dev team a while! :)
TL;DR: Trying to fix MacOS Catalina font display led to requiring all kinds of work to migrate and evolve the Reddcoin Core software with Apple, Bitcoin and QT components. Lots of work done, v3.1 public release soon. Also other exciting things and ReddID back under active dev effort.
submitted by TechAdept to reddCoin [link] [comments]

Vampyr - Review Thread

Game Information

Game Title: Vampyr
Genre: Action role-playing game, third-person
Platforms: PlayStation 4, Xbox One, PC
Media: Concept Teaser
E3 2016 Trailer
Pre-Alpha Gameplay Trailer
'The Darkness Within'
E3 2017 Trailer
Dontnod Presents Vampyr - Webseries Playlist
Story Trailer
'Becoming the Monster' Trailer
Launch Trailer
Developer: DONTNOD Entertainment Info
Publisher: Focus Home Interactive
Price: PC - $49.99 USD
PS4, XB1 - $59.99 USD
Release Date: June 4th, 2018
More Info: Vampyr | Wikipedia Page)
Review Aggregator:
OpenCritic - 73 [Cross-Platform] Current Score Distribution
MetaCritic - 72 [PS4]
MetaCritic - 71 [XB1]
MetaCritic - 74 [PC]
Bloody arbitrary list of past DONTNOD games -
Entry Score Platform, Year, # of Critics
Remember Me 70 X360, 2013, 42 critics
Life Is Strange 85 PS4, 2015, 23 critics

Reviews

Website/Author Aggregates' Score ~ Critic's Score Quote Platform
AngryCentaurGaming - Jeremy Penter Buy ~ Buy This is absolutely a 'Buy', it is well worth it at full price on the consoles and for the 45 it is available on Steam for. The game does betray its "double-A" budget at times, but to me, Vampyr is a great example of a title doing something different that I'm not sure a AAA company company would do. A lot of the safeguards that we see, even in some other AA games, when it comes to society's impacts and the social decisions you can make are gone here. Those consequences hard-felt and they are instant, and the inevitable character death of somebody that you actually like is gonna hit you even more. Combat's fun and not perfect, but it works to keep you engaged as well. At 25 hours without doing everything with so many different ways and situations this can play out, I would assume two playthroughs at minimum is what I'll do with this title, and it really does show that a game can be far more than the sum of its parts, and certainly not reflect just the budget. PS4, XB1, PC
Player2.net.au - Matt Hewson Unscored ~ Unscored A beautifully told gothic tale with interesting skill systems and some fun combat is only let down by window dressing and a location that feels like a stage and not an actual city. Vampyr might not be the game of the year, but it is certainly going to be one of the most interesting titles we see in 2018 and, sales permitting, a title that will only get better in future sequels. PS4, XB1, PC
Eurogamer - Aoife Wilson Unscored ~ Not Recommended Dontnod takes a thrillingly Gothic perspective on early 19th century London, but squanders it in a dreary and indecisive adventure. PS4
VG247 - Marshall Lemon Unscored ~ Unscored Vampyr is an ambitious masterpiece with forgivable flaws
Rock, Paper, Shotgun - Alec Meer Unscored ~ Unscored I'm left frustrated that Vampyr falls short of truly combining a smart choose-your-own-adventure game with a meaty action one. PC
Polygon - Charlie Hall Review-in-Progress ~ Review-In-Progress The easy way out for Dontnod would have been to take the most time-worn tropes from dime store horror novels, season to taste with period melodrama and serve it all up for players to enjoy. Vampyr reaches for more, and I'm very interested to see if the finale does it all justice
Nerd Much? - Rhys Pugatschew 90 ~ 9 / 10 Victorian vampires have never been so intriguing and exciting as they are in Vampyr. PS4
GameSkinny - Autumn Fish 90 ~ 9 / 10 stars Vampyr is a brilliant single-player RPG with deep social mechanics that make playing as a vampire a truly unique and satisfying experience. PC
COGconnected - Garrett Drake 88 ~ 88 / 100 Witnessing a studio succeed beyond what their audience expects of them is always a pleasure, and DONTNOD Entertainment has done just that with Vampyr. Whether you're intrigued by the idea of stalking London as a bloodthirsty vampire or expressly fancy a rock-solid ARPG, consider sinking your teeth into this gem. PS4
Hobby Consolas - Álvaro Alonso - Spanish 88 ~ 88 / 100 Even with it's noticeable flaws, Vampyr has the potential to be the new cult gem among vampire lovers. If you can see beyond technical limitations, the story and characters will trap you within their arms and suck until the very last drop of... your time. PS4
Cerealkillerz - Gabriel Bogdan - German 87 ~ 8.7 / 10 Vampyr exceeds all expectations and delivers a thrilling vampire adventure with great storytelling and a gameplay that borrows the right elements from games like Bloodborne. If you can live with some longer loading screens and a missing fast travel option you'll get a well made Action-RPG with lots of enjoyable content. PS4
DualShockers - Tanner Pierce 85 ~ 8.5 / 10 While a couple of technical issues stop it from being a masterpiece, Vampyr is still a fantastic title that will keep you entertained for hours. PS4
GameSpace - Brandedwolf 85 ~ 8.5 / 10 If you enjoy your story a bit on the darker side and making choices that matter, then give Vampyr a try. PC
GamingTrend - Ron Burke 85 ~ 85 / 100 Vampyr manages to deliver on its promise to make choices matter. Every decision has implications that spider out in unseen directions, often far into the future. While there are some wobbles in terms of combat and load times, the engaging storyline and premise carry this title far. PC
PlayStation Universe - Neil Bolt 80 ~ 8 / 10 There's no denying that Vampyr has some mighty rough edges to it and combat that is decent, but unspectacular. Yet there's a delicious sense of place to it that makes it undeniably interesting to get stuck into. Many of the game's flaws melt away as you get lost in the moody grime of this alternate version of wartime London. The most important job Vampyr had to do was to present a compelling game about the tragic romanticism of being a vampire, and the fight for retaining humanity or embracing the unnatural power it brings. Vampyr does drop the ball on many small things, but it does that important job superbly. PS4
Twinfinite - Alex Gibson 80 ~ 4 / 5 Ultimately, the sum of Vampyr's emphasis on story, combat, and progression combine to produce a video gaming experience that will appeal to those outside the RPG and adventure genres that it seeks to combine. My hope is that it finds its audience so that we might yet again see Dr. Reid on an even grander scale in the future. PS4
Total Gaming Network - Shawn Zipay 80 ~ 4 / 5 stars Aside from a few technical issues, Vampyr delivers one of the most engaging action-RPGs in recent memory. It is a game where everything and everyone is connected through some fantastic gameplay design and yes, your choices do actually matter here. PC
IGN Spain - Jose A. Rodríguez - Spanish 80 ~ 8 / 10 An amazing game full of darkness, vampires and blood in the London of the first quarter of the 20th Century. A great mix of exploration, conversations and hard ecounters with dangerous creatures of the night. PS4
SelectButton - Kevin Mitchell 80 ~ 8 / 10 Although Vampyr's combat system is thoroughly satisfying, it's the dark atmosphere and narrative that genuinely makes the game a must-have. Your choices define the experience, altering a world full of discovery and intrigue all around you. Do you give in to your blight and feast upon the weak and unworthy inhabitants of London or do you become their salvation? It should take you anywhere from 20-30 hours to complete the narrative, but if you want to see all of the possible endings, you'll have to play through multiple times, altering your choices and decisions regarding the lives of the citizens. PC
Hardcore Gamer - Jordan Helm 80 ~ 4 / 5 It takes some doing to find a middle-ground between two such conflicting genres, but Dontnod have done a terrific job marrying Adventure and Action RPG elements into a pleasant and modestly cohesive whole. PC
Tech Advisor - Lewis Painter 80 ~ 4 / 5 stars If you're looking for a story-focused RPG, Vampyr is a solid option. It offers in-depth conversation options, game-changing choices to make and an intriguing storyline full of plot twists and betrayal.
EGM - Emma Schaefer 80 ~ 8 / 10 Vampyr walks a fine line between narrative storytelling and action-oriented combat, trying to appeal to fans of both genres and mostly succeeding. Though the game lacks polish in many areas, it stars a clever morality system that entices players towards both good and evil deeds, a well-rounded web of background NPCs, and an intriguing overall narrative of an undead doctor investigating the spread of the Spanish Influenza, making Vampyr a treat for any vampire fan. PC
Wccftech - Rosh Kelly 80 ~ 8 / 10 Dontnod worked hard to create an immersive, dark world to explore and it succeeds in doing so. Despite some boring conversations, most of the world of Vampyr is an exciting, dangerous place and if nothing else, being a vampire in here is also very fun. PS4
TrustedReviews - Andi Hamilton 80 ~ 4 / 5 stars Vampyr might not be what many wanted after Life Is Strange, but it’s still an enjoyable – well, as enjoyable as its grim nature allows – game nonetheless. It follows the modern action RPG template almost to a fault, but the agency the player has in shaping the districts by disease control and straight up murder is a lot more interesting than some of the moments in other games within the genre, where they present you a binary choice that pushes the plot forward. It’s a decent idea holding up an otherwise solid game, but overall Vampyr is worth a look if you’re looking for something to plug the gap in your life in this post- Witcher 3 world. PS4
GamesBeat - Anthony John Agnello 75 ~ 75 / 100 At no point in Vampyr did I have fun following trails of blood, mixing antiquated remedies out of opium, or bludgeoning some Crucifix wielding goon in a mask for the 50th time. But I was constantly compelled forward to find out what next grim choice it would give me, anxious to spend yet another night in one of its safehouses to see if my efforts to keep London's souls alive another day had worked. PS4
WellPlayed - Kieran Stockton 75 ~ 7.5 / 10 If you can fight your way through some technical issues, a good story and interesting action RPG mechanics can make for a bloody good time PS4
Just Push Start - Grant E. Gaines 73 ~ 7.3 / 10 Vampyr is a hard game to review, because there is enough to warrant a low score, yet the experience is satisfying enough to make up for this. For better or worse, giving answers and explaining things make it easier to invest in the story, with the conclusion certainly being worth the time. The ability to interact with NPCs, heal them, figure out more about the world and extract new information also adds a lot. It’s just, when it comes to gameplay, Vampyr falls short. With loading screens being common when players move too fast, combat often being more about managing stamina, difficulty stemming from how willing are you to kill innocent people and a needlessly frustrating waypoint system, it’s easy to get frustrated. With this in mind, anyone looking for a vampire romance story or just want to experience a world filled with answers should consider picking Vampyr up, where as action-RPG or open world fans can probably skip it. PS4
Heavy - Collin MacGregor 75 ~ 7.5 / 10 Vampyr is a bloody good time that is marred by some tedious mechanics and some technical issues. Hitting a game-breaking bug certainly soured my experience, but the wonderfully written characters kept me going until the credits rolled. This may not be a perfect RPG, but Vampyr is still a fun time for those wanting something a bit darker in their games. PC
VideoGamer - Alice Bell 70 ~ 7 / 10 Vampyr serves delicious ladles of angst and drama with a hearty slice of excellent, morally grey choice system that will genuinely surprise you, all wrapped up in a wonderfully gloomy London. It's just a shame the combat turns a bit sour. PS4
Rocket Chainsaw - Adam Ghiggino 70 ~ 3.5 / 5 stars Tying hard moral decisions to real gameplay in a compelling open-world RPG is an ambitious goal, and it’s one that Vampyr achieves to an extent. PS4
GamesRadar+ - Leon Hurley 70 ~ 3.5 / 5 stars As much a detective story as a horror one, Vampyr rewards you for taking an interest in the people around you and tests your moral compass with a lack of black and white options.
GameSpot - Justin Clark 70 ~ 7 / 10 Dontnod follows up Life Is Strange with a surprisingly enthralling supernatural thriller. PS4, PC
IGN - Brandin Tyrrel 70 ~ 7 / 10 Vampyr is a slow burn of an RPG, taking its time to ramp up its intriguing blend of science and the supernatural in an elaborately gloomy version of London. When it gets going you can see the potential of the way it offers you more power if you consume its interesting citizens. But Vampyr never commits to this idea to the point where I felt I needed to make that sacrifice to succeed in its relatively simple combat, which leaves it feeling toothless and vulnerable to having a lot of its fun sucked away by technical issues, despite its genuinely engaging story. PS4
Metro GameCentral - GameCentral 70 ~ 7 / 10 An inspired use of the usual vampire clichés with some fascinating moral decisions to make, that always impact the game world and its combat in unexpected ways. PS4
PC Gamer - Andy Kelly 68 ~ 68 / 100 There are some brilliant, original ideas in here, but Vampyr tries to do too much at once and suffers for it. PC
GameMAG - ACE - Russian 60 ~ 6 / 10 Vampyr did not live up to our expectations and did not reach the level of Life is Strange. So, if If you were expecting another Dontnod masterpiece, you'll be disappointed. If you're interested in setting, then it's probably worth a try, but only at a discount price. PC
Destructoid - Kevin Mersereau 60 ~ 6 / 10 The story may be a tad lackluster, and the combat may be clunky as hell, but Vampyr does offer a compelling adventure for those looking for some blood-sucking fun. It also manages to effectively make you feel like a creature of the night at times. Unfortunately, the frequent technical issues sapped just about every ounce of joy from the experience, leaving this digital world a dry, lifeless husk. PS4
TheSixthAxis - Aran Suddi 60 ~ 6 / 10 Much like its early 20th century setting, Vampyr feels like a bit of a throwback to a past age of action RPGs. In a time where the genre is evolving Vampyr holds on to past ideas for much of its tenure, and it doesn't have a story strong enough to overcome that fact. The world itself is ripe for lots of stories to be told within, with Dontnod having done a good job with world building, but while Vampyr isn't a bad game, nor is it as great as it could be. PS4
RPG Site - Kyle Campbell 60 ~ 6 / 10 Vampyr is ambitious for sure, but with ambition comes risk, and unfortunately, here it provides very little in the way of rewards. PC
Cubed3 - Renan Fontes 60 ~ 6 / 10 Although flawed and at times painfully inconsistent, Vampyr manages to offer relatively engaging gameplay in spite of a lack of overall polish. Combat is stiff and quite mindless, but Jonathan's progression deeper into Vampiredom is handled well and the abilities at his disposal go a long way towards masking some of the more mundane aspects of the battle system. It's more whether or not Jonathan decides to prey on the people of London, and its consequences, that keep the experience fresh. There's a trade off between making Jonathan and keeping districts stable, each one offering their own benefits. There are technical issues, and the performance is lacking on every front, but Vampyr has enough going for it conceptually that it's worth sinking some time into, if only to be a vampire in 20th century London. PS4
Push Square - Glen Fox 60 ~ 6 / 10 Vampyr has a ton of interesting ideas, an intriguing world, and a great cast of characters, but is ultimately let down by its narrow-minded focus on unnecessary combat. PS4
USgamer - Hirun Cryer 60 ~ 3 / 5 stars Vampyr unfortunately flounders after building some solid foundations in the opening hours. London feels like a city on a knife edge, and the citizens prove to be an inviting cast of creative characters. But Vampyr then lures you into sacrificing these characters, cutting out a key part of the game, all to have a hope of standing up to the horrors that await you in the shadows of London. PS4
TechRaptor - Robert Grosso 60 ~ 6 / 10 Vampyr has a lot of good ideas, but its execution is sorely lacking in most areas. It is a game that is competent in terms of its systems, but ultimately fairly boring to play. PS4
Game Revolution - Matt Utley 50 ~ 2.5 / 5 stars Vampyr feels like a dug-up PlayStation 2 game. It wears its ambition on its sleeve, even if it looks at times to be wearing a tank top. The underlying game mechanics require a certain amount of suspension of disbelief, but those that can will find an entertaining penny dreadful. PS4
Slant Magazine - Steven Scaife 50 ~ 2.5 / 5 stars Rather than going for size in the character roster, Dontnod might have done better to shoot for complexity. PC
We Got This Covered - David Morgan 50 ~ 2.5 / 5 stars Vampyr competently displays an understanding of combat, dialogue, and narrative choice, but it never rises above mediocrity, and is an utter failure on a technical level. The aesthetic of the world is the best thing on display, but beyond it lies a derivative title that fails to leave a lasting impression. PS4
EDIT - Well ain't this confusing. This was the first review thread posted, which was removed by automod I'm assuming. There was another thread posted after this that is now removed and this one is back up (Just in case anyone needs context). I'll be back to updating!
EDIT 2 - Apparently automod was NOT the reason the thread was removed, it was reddit itself that removed this thread because of one of the websites being flagged for spam.
EDIT 3 - Would people rather have reviews be ordered by website names in alphabetical order or ascending/descending list of scores or completely random?
submitted by ninjyte to Games [link] [comments]

Discord Conv. 12/11

Disclaimer: This is my editing, which definitely reflects my personal views about the drama.

Just for those who don't have time to scroll the discord and want to have a quick glance about this drama.

12/11
David SønstebøYesterday at 8:23 PM We are progressing well
David SønstebøYesterday at 8:27 PM @Werner Today's medium post by the Semkos explain why it did not happen. We as a non-profit Foundation who has the mandate of developing an open source permissionless technology could not sign a unilateral NDA with a for-profit company. Today's blog post by the Semkos really reveal why they wanted this, they plan to patent technology.
WernerYesterday at 8:28 PM Patented technology has a way harder way to reach global standards...
David SønstebøYesterday at 8:28 PM It never will.
David SønstebøYesterday at 8:30 PM The Semkos failing to get patents won't affect IOTA.
David SønstebøYesterday at 8:31 PM It seems Nikita is Economic Clustering (they even use this term), so it's prior art.
David SønstebøYesterday at 8:48 PM I have consistently defended the Semko brothers against accusations that they are exploiting our community with the intent of backstabbing it. We have offered the Semkos flexible positions in the IOTA Foundation to compensate for their work, which they have declined. We have always held both Roman and Vitaly in high regard, but knowing the 'behind the scenes', reading today's blog post and their Phybr website, leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth. They have made a name for themselves and got followers based solely on IOTA, and now they are going in the direction of trying to patent what is by all signs IOTA prior art. They also explicitly state that they intend to support 'multiple coins'. This looks like classical manipulation of the community, keep mentioning IOTA enough to keep the community interested in what they are doing, while in reality attempting to disrupt the same community. Open Source lives and die by its communities. Now that the ICO craze has finally faded, it is time to consolidate around projects, not to fragment them. To be sure, whatever Phybr is, it does not threaten IOTA, IOTA is lightyears ahead of anything they could even theoretically have, even piggybacking on IOTA's work, but it is a distraction and confusion for the community. Given that they have now revealed that they do intend to patent their technology and have refused all attempts at official collaboration, I hereby advice the community to be very skeptical of the Semko's intentions until they prove that all their promises (which they have even accepted donations for) of working to increase the adoption of IOTA are true.
WakanDanYesterday at 8:58 PM They had this strategy before asking for a meeting. This was all a PR stunt after all
David SønstebøYesterday at 9:10 PM @RicardRoyo Not at all, they can't patent prior art. Let me make this clear: IF has always valued the Semkos as community members, but they are not in any shape, way or form critical to anything related to IOTA's success. However, them piggybacking on the IOTA brand (they even renamed to DevIOTA when starting work on Nikita) and causing confusion and disruption in the community, is not something we can support.
Mr GlassYesterday at 9:16 PM David, do you think they maybe would use the meeting to claim to be authors of their idea, which is probably very close to CfBs EC? With a NDA signed you could get in trouble for doing similar work, right?
David SønstebøYesterday at 9:17 PM @Mr Glass I won't speculate on what their intentions were with the unilateral NDA.
David SønstebøYesterday at 9:21 PM @Deep_Sea_Hopper I highly doubt that scenario. EC is known, EC is implemented in code etc. I am not at all worried about that. What I dislike is distraction and fragmentation of community, which is why I am forced to take a harder stance right now. IOTA made the Semkos, and now the Semkos look like they are exploiting this trust and support that you - the IOTA community - have given them. Roman's latest tweet re: Coordicide is quite revealing, they were offered to work together with our vast team, with very good salaries, on Coordicide, but instead they elected to decline that under the guise of wanting to be 'independent', which is fine, but now it is made obvious that this independence is less about creating a thriving and healthy community, but more about maximizing profits. In general, there is nothing wrong with a for-profit model, within IOTA there are tons of for-profit opportunities, but when they start talking about patenting consensus and piggybacking on their trust within IOTA to also on the side 'support multiple coins', that enters an uncomfortable territory for me.
citrullinYesterday at 9:25 PM @David Sønstebø Hi David. I talked to some people about this. And I don't have a good feeling about the Semkos things either. But some people mentioned concerns about the ternary and the whole story behind it. (I don't think that a lot of people question ternary itself, more the incensive and private company behind it). I think it's more the intransparency about everything regarding this topic. So, from my perspective, I think it would help to be more transparent about this topic to strenghten the IOTA community. Especially the IOTA developer community. But, of course, I can understand when there are valid reasons against it. I just want to tell your my opinion. I currently see a little risk of splitting the community and I don't want to see this happen.
David SønstebøYesterday at 9:28 PM @citrullin Ternary is mathematically superior, this is something the universe decided on when it created itself, there's tons of research on ternary, ternary is a very hot topic in Machine Learning, and there are multiple companies developing ternary hardware in some form or another. IOTA is not 'bound' by ternary, this is a myth that seems to be spread by FUDsters. IOTA is simply optimized for that future where IoT devices need absolute optimization, for legacy binary it does not matter at all that IOTA is ternary, these devices can afford the overhead.
Deep_Sea_HopperYesterday at 9:39 PM Hey, Remember when PEAQ said they were pro IOTA, weren't going to ICO, and weren't in it for the money!!! hahha
JimbobYesterday at 9:39 PM @Deep_Sea_Hopper 100% we will see a fundraising effort before any whitepaper.
citrullinYesterday at 9:41 PM @David Sønstebø That is totally true. I already used it on my Bluepill (STM32F1). So it's proven that we can use IOTA on small Microcontroller. My statement was not about any technical facts. Not questioned that at all. It's more about peoples feelings. Especially trust. Since not everything is transparent, people might fear that the IOTA protocols design decisions are based on commercial interests. So, I hope you understand why this is currently more present than ever. In context of the Semko brothers. So, it might give people more trust in IOTA to be more transparent, open about this topic.
KiLLuYesterday at 9:42 PM @David Sønstebø are there any plans to do a board ama again on youtube? The last was a few months ago, so i think there is a lot to say.
David SønstebøYesterday at 9:44 PM @citrullin Thanks for the support. IOTA has always been about pushing the boundary for the future. We do have a ternary series planned that explain why we chose ternary, the history of ternary, ternary vs binary vs *ary, what the current status of ternary in the wider industry is etc. But that requires time @WakanDan To be honest, the Semko drama is not significant to the IOTA program or project. It's about how they are using you - the community - the IOTA Foundation has never depended on the Semkos for anything. So I won't be making any tweets from my account about it, this is a community matter. @KiLLu YES
WASSIMATHIMNI[FREE CARLOS]Yesterday at 9:45 PM Community sent them raspberry pis for their own profit What a shame
David SønstebøYesterday at 9:51 PM Sure, my sentiment has always been that Open Source is dependent on communities, so I will always fight for the rights of the community that has built around IOTA. The community deserves to know if they are being exploited or not. However, when it comes to this specific matter, I am not going to throw gasoline on the fire on twitter, as twitter is more external. I am not at all worried about the industry or investors seeing this, I mean all it shows is that the IOTA Foundation has been working to support the community and assist community developers.
DariusYesterday at 10:01 PM David said it yesterday in context of the NDA thing. Te IF feels committed to the “contract” with the community to stay focused on open source. In the same way, the Semkos may have entered a “contract” (not legally speaking, just morally) with the community members that donated to them to contribute directly to the Iota protocol. If now people feel that this “contract” is breached by the Semkos, the community should get together, form one voice and express their opinion publicly. No need for the IF to get into that imho.
HagiYesterday at 10:02 PM not planning any ICO and saying "not our prioretiy at this moment" are basically different shoes lol
Deep_Sea_HopperYesterday at 10:08 PM I think many people forget as well; though Nelson helped bring attention and grow the community, Nelson actually works against the Tangle and is not in the vision of the IF. Even though CFB discussed this with Semko, they kept straight on their path disregarding the big vision. Not to take away from them... they helped the community grow, but the truth is they always kind of did their own thing and disregarded the Tangles vision.
Deep_Sea_HopperYesterday at 10:11 PM I believe it was that Nelson doesn't consider topology, and because it constantly changes neighbors. Topology of the network should be in a way geographical I guess, rather than criss-crossing around the world. I'm not that technical, so I'm sure I'm messing it up. Also, I believe Field created an issue as well... can't remember how though.
Deep_Sea_HopperYesterday at 10:14 PM It solves the immediate issue of maintaining good neighbors... but I think as the Tangle evolves there will be a replacement or simply it will fade away. Just my guess
HagiYesterday at 10:16 PM Semkoin?
limo_tangleblogYesterday at 10:16 PM I received them yesterday.
KiLLuYesterday at 10:16 PM so they dont a own ico but selling icos
limo_tangleblogYesterday at 10:17 PM anonymously of course, sheds a different light on all of this.
Deep_Sea_HopperYesterday at 10:18 PM The other thing is, everyone thinks Semko Brothers are amazing! and the community is lost without them. They are good for sure, but hey, there have been many Semko's... thing is, they actually decided to work for the IF because they believe in the vision. Semko didn't believe in the mission, so he stayed as a non-affiliated community member. Which means, there will be another Semko in the community, just as Microhash came after him. Microhash joined the IF.. and soon there will be another amazing community member. And at some point the IF won't be able to hire more employees... hahaha
David SønstebøYesterday at 10:21 PM @PergamumTJ All the tokens were up for sale, not a single iota was 'premined' for anyone Now that https://twitter.com/tangleblog/status/1072116857912680449 Tangleblog.com (@tangleblog) @RomanSemko @benjamim Well, pardon me, no ICO (your website indeed states that) it's a separate coin (Semkoin), it has, apparently, been shared with many VC's weeks ago, and your website has been created in November. I received that presentation anonymously yesterday, incl... Twitter Has come to light, I feel that the truth is out. The Semkos has clearly been talking with two tongues.
t00kYesterday at 10:22 PM @limo_tangleblog are you sure these "prints" are real?
HagiYesterday at 10:22 PM lol if thats not a fake, im losing the faith in humanity
limo_tangleblogYesterday at 10:25 PM if it's fake? we will see when the Semkos react, that's the reason I shared them publicly under our discussion on twitter. If it's fake, I apologize, if not, everything is said and done.
Grobian - IOTAshops.comYesterday at 10:29 PM A community can build you, but a community can also tear you down. Just saying. I don‘t know if it‘s a smart move to fool such a big and enthusiastic community.
ricardosnowYesterday at 10:30 PM It's true that he always seems friendly. However he never told us about their agenda. People donated to him thinking that was for the benefit of IOTA itself as an open source, and that's sad. I didn't donate, but if i did I would like to receive the money back.
Slavik ButalikYesterday at 10:31 PM i want my field donation from last season already, give it to the sheeps and then uninstall field and nelson.
capre IOTAYesterday at 10:32 PM So basically people who donated with iota tokens, did devaluate their own coin in a way, with supporting the semko's.
BuckfuddyYesterday at 10:33 PM Semko already losing followers on twitter
David SønstebøYesterday at 10:33 PM I encourage everyone to be civil, and remember that even though this is upsetting, it does not affect IOTA in the slightest. IOTA has never depended on the Semkos. I have always defended the two based on believing that their intentions were honest, but I can't fault the community for feeling betrayed after this. You can't mislead a whole community and piggyback on it to make a name for yourself, and then go behind their back and expect them not to be upset. The good thing is that this Semko-fiasco over the last days has brought the community together to reject this sort of exploitation of itself. This is healthy.
PatriQYesterday at 10:34 PM @David Sønstebø Do not worry about IOTA reputation, facts are out now, nothing to worry about...its clear
2pacYesterday at 11:31 PM @muXxer and people are free to criticize them for how they go about it
muXxerYesterday at 11:32 PM But i hate this negative witch hunt everytime
Jacq IOTAYesterday at 11:32 PM I believe many people are duped into donating to them. They aren't forthcoming about their goals before accepting other people's donations.
citrullinYesterday at 11:34 PM @Jacq IOTA That is what I crisis them for. And I understand why the people feel like the Semkos just used them.
Deep_Sea_HopperYesterday at 11:34 PM MuXer... it doesn't worry me, and I actually am glad the IF has a little bit of competition. What I hate about the whole crypto-space is the lies and misleading social media posts. Such as: we won't ICO, we don't want to be like them.... then truth comes out and they are going for the money
David SønstebøYesterday at 11:37 PM @muXxer The community is pissed off precisely because it seems what the Semkos were planning was actually fragmentation of the community, rather than consolidation No one is pissed at the Semkos for doing for-profit ventures on the side
MuanhYesterday at 11:39 PM I mean that is even how semkos started. They wanted to create a for profit iota hardware wallet but needed autopeering So thats why they created nelson
t00kYesterday at 11:39 PM They are allowed to do other stuff, and you too, of course. I think people feel deceived when they donate (either money or Pi's) thinking it would be useful for the community. And then weekly updates with how good it goes, that they are gonna meet up with the IF.. Then all of a sudden Semkoin drops
MuanhYesterday at 11:39 PM But they said or where implying they were creating a new consensus algo for iota and accepting donations for it the donation part is the important part
David SønstebøYesterday at 11:44 PM This drama was unfortunately real. ICOs and Trojan horsing ones way into a community under the guise of supporting it, when the real intent is actually fragmenting that community into a separate patented for-profit network, is not how one achieves a standardized open permissionless ledger. The ICO nonsense of 2017 set the entire cryptospace back over a year. I am very happy to see that the community takes a strong stance against that.
Trill Pill [Roman Scamko fan]Yesterday at 11:46 PM roman and his brother should refund any donations theyve received, what kinda fucking business practice is to accept donations from community members under the premise that youll develop for this community and then change course and do your own thing but keep the donation, honorless bullshit
https://twitter.com/tangleblog/status/1072116857912680449 https://twitter.com/tangleblog/status/1072117068277927936 https://twitter.com/tangleblog/status/1072117319537778689
WakanDanYesterday at 11:48 PM Thanks @limo_tangleblog for sharing the investor deck. It's a real shame they tried to mask their true agenda. Their comments today remind me of the saying "It takes many good deeds to build a good reputation, and only one bad one to lose it." What makes IOTA great in my opinion is our community, partnerships, superior tech, vision and the growing IF team of talents (and spec). I don't know any other project capable of boasting of all of these. Some may try to seek short-term gain, regardless of potential impact to the community, but this shouldn't distract us from IOTA's vision and valuing what we have.
citrullinYesterday at 11:50 PM @muXxer That's not the point. But accepting donations, tweeting about: Hey, we need some Pis, in hope that the community will donates some etc. is not a nice way to do that. As it looks like, they used the Pis just for they own profits. I understand why people are not happy about this.
Come-from-BeyondToday at 12:03 AM @muXxer For me it seems some people are pissed because they do for profit stuff There are nuances. When I saw that fancy GIF with the Semko testing their variant of consensus on Tangle I liked it, because it looked exactly as Economic Clustering. Their reinvention of EC means validation of my work. I didn't patent EC because I wanted the whole mankind to benefit from my invention. But then I got info that the Semko are patenting the tech. And are planning to earn money on that. Isn't it normal that I'm a little bit upset with how the things unfolded? Now I'm waiting for their patent details to be published, if their tech is actually EC then I'm afraid we'll see more drama. Because I want the tech to be kept in the public domain.
David SønstebøToday at 12:05 AM Of course Semko is no threat This is not about that
David SønstebøToday at 12:07 AM Of course @gusp There's been numerous clones of IOTA already, all are dead
David SønstebøToday at 12:08 AM The Semko's got exposed to the community before they could fragment the community. So the threat is over.
capre IOTAToday at 12:08 AM If your not being cloned, ur doing something wrong.
AconitinToday at 12:09 AM @David Sønstebø I'm not in legal, so I wonder - What would happen to the IOTA development if the Semkos patented EC? Wouldn't it forbid IF's further development on the technology then?
David SønstebøToday at 12:09 AM @Aconitin You don't get prior art patents
Trill Pill [Roman Scamko fan]Today at 12:10 AM All the raspberry pis, iota and money thats been donated to them should be refunded, because of their dishonesty about their true intentions the iota community essentially funded a competetior, they're scammers in my eyes, saying theyll develop for iota and then doing the opposite was a false premise for everyone that was kind enough to donate resources and they mustve known they were lying for a while alreeady
David SønstebøToday at 12:11 AM This is untrue. The Ecosystem Dev Fund was not yet legally set up, which we informed the Semkos of. Furthermore, a prerequisite of EDF grant is that your work is open source, theirs is not.
Come-from-BeyondToday at 12:14 AM @w4lker [semkofork liason] [could the patent legally prohibit d IF to work anymore on EC's?] The prior art already exists on Tangle (couldn't resist temptation to protect my know-how, as usual :trollface: ), but proving that involves a lot of legal work.
Deep_Sea_HopperToday at 12:16 AM @Buckfuddy at the time Field wasn't open-sourced. Even on discord IF dev's asked Roman to open-source the code. He kept stating he was cleaning the code.
David SønstebøToday at 12:18 AM @Matin That paragraph summarizes this whole endeavor beautifully. When did the Board ever say that a line of their code was ours? Never. We have stated the fact that the Semkos built their name on the IOTA community, branded themselves as "IOTA Dev" and"Tangle Researchers" when they began work on Nikita, they have continuously communicated on Twitter that they are working on different ways to optimize the Tangle etc. etc. etc. This incessant lying after today's revelations makes it impossible for me to take them serious. This blatant lie is just as bad as the misleading of the community that they did.
Come-from-BeyondToday at 12:20 AM @diskings Are there actions that can be done right now... dunno, I'm busy with coding Ict and other stuff, waiting for the patent and then sending C&D letter seems to be the cheapest option now
David SønstebøToday at 12:20 AM The Semkos were never in IOTA's roadmap, we have very solid paths to Coordicide and have a dozen researchers working on the most optimized direction
Come-from-BeyondToday at 12:21 AM I hope they will be honest with potential investors and warn them about the risk of IP infringement...
raphiToday at 12:21 AM @David Sønstebø did any of you ever see a line of their code?
David SønstebøToday at 12:22 AM @raphi No. AFAIK, no one has. We respected them as community members prior to today, but they have never even been remotely equated into anything R&D IOTA-wise.
FredericToday at 12:23 AM @David Sønstebø Sorry for disrupting semkoin drama... Will the ~95 non-chosen brainstorm submissions be published by IF? They might be a solid base for lots of community projects in 2019. Would it be even possible to apply for ecosystem fund and implement someones idea (open source) ?
David SønstebøToday at 12:23 AM @Frederic Yes they will, and yes.
David SønstebøToday at 12:25 AM There is really nothing more to discuss. The Semko brothers got exposed, they exploited the community, and continue to lie in their 'clarification blog post'. As far as I am concerned, they are history. Per Lind 2.0
Deep_Sea_HopperToday at 12:30 AM David, I remember you writing a great blog post about what was completed in 2017, milestones etc., and a very general outlook on 2018. Will you do another 2018 recap article similar to the 2017 one?
David SønstebøToday at 12:31 AM @Deep_Sea_Hopper 2018 Year in review, 2019 Year in preview yup
David SønstebøToday at 12:34 AM Me pointing out the objective fact that the Semkos are demonstrably lying about IF board statements in their desperate damage control campaign takes me approximately ~5 seconds, that does not at all stress me. If anything, I am relieved that the community found the truth and thus the confusion over the Semkos is history, making IOTA's community more focused and no longer vulnerable to being confused.
Come-from-BeyondToday at 12:37 AM Does anyone know if the Semko control that autopeering service? I'd like to remind that I warned against using it. I sent a whitepaper to @Vitaly Semko asking to change it logic (which was ignored). Now, when it's clear that the Semko used IOTA mainnet as a testnet for their Phybr project, maybe we'll reconsider our approach to node peering?
svenger87Today at 12:40 AM [I read anywhere it finds the truth in 100ms] @Marc Lopresti CFB debunked it already with the speed of light
IOTA IS KING! 👑Today at 12:47 AM 2 devs looking for their own financial gain vs group of scientists, engineers and other qualified individuals trying to implement an open universal standard for all.
GeorgeToday at 12:47 AM Do you think Semkos have patented EC? If that is true, the meeting with IF was a trap.
Ralf Rottmann [IF]Today at 12:47 AM I just now learned about the SemkoDev pitch deck and the idea to create a SemkoCoin / ICO as a segue-way to building their own brand on the working body that has been established by this community. Now I finally understand the motivation behind trying to trick me into signing a unilateral NDA, with fines for just one of the two parties and making it super difficult getting two of the founders into the meeting remotely. So far, I had perceived Roman as a very reasonable person and was wondering, why making this so complicated. Well, if one plans to exploit the IOTA community for your own at least questionable ICO all along, it suddenly explains just everything. One less question-mark, although a sad one. Wonder how potential investors see this and what it means for IP related claims down the line.
David SønstebøToday at 12:55 AM The only threat that existed was the community continuing to be exploited, that is no longer possible. So the whole saga is really over.
Roman SemkoToday at 3:13 AM I will say it here once, and will not discuss. As know there are plenty of maximalists in the community which will not react to any reasoning. I truly hoped that IOTA community was different. Yes, we are working on commercial projects besides IOTA. This should not be a surprise. It was even communicated at our last call with David almost two months ago. Our aim was to find a way to apply our know-how to IOTA on a fair basis. This was also the reason why we postponed any PoCs we planned related to Nikita as far as we could. As the meeting with IF was cancelled, due to time constraints, and after announcements that IF probably has a 4th solution for the coordinator, we had to accept the PoC. This has nothing to do with IOTA. It is not an ICO and I do not see it as a competition to IOTA. For us, it’s our daily business. The deck? Yes, you somehow have to present a potential party the way how this new project could be sustainably financed. What is wrong with that? Regarding our IP: it is our IP and is NOT based on any work done by IF. It will be obvious soon enough. Latest, when we publish the details and open-source our work. Obviously, we cannot rely just on cooperation with IF and had to take measures in case we will be applying Nikita on commercial PoCs. Exactly this is what happened. I understand the emotions in the community, people fearing competition, fearing the fate of their own investments. I understand founders’ fear of competition and a better product. Steps have to be taken to discredit other’s work and reputation. We have been there before when IOTA was shitstormed by other Cryptos one year ago, remember? I just hope that this community was different. There is probably nothing I can say to convince everybody. A fate of public position is that whatever you do, there will be someone who does not like it. Maybe just that we still do not consider us a competition to IOTA. We still hold IOTA and want to continue development of IOTA-based solutions. There are no ICOs planned. And we truly hope for a productive and constructive 2019.
Jacq IOTAToday at 4:07 AM Wish the people who donated to you saw the leaked slides. I am sure they want in on the “spectacular ROI”.
dtToday at 4:09 AM @Roman Semko Do you plan return donations? RPi, money etc?
David SønstebøToday at 4:12 AM I will write this one final response to Roman's message: Roman, you are attempting to twist reality here by pretending that you are a victim of "IOTA maximalism" for simply being for-profit. As recent as yesterday I was defending you in this very channel against the community's suspicions that you had shady intentions of exploiting the community. One of the arguments I used to defend you was that I was under the impression that your DLT for-profit activities were to strengthen IOTA's ecosystem. No person in all of IOTA has echoed the need for for-profit independent community members than I, so I encouraged people not to get carried away with fear-driven speculation and instead trust the commitments and comments you have made publicly regarding your devotion to the IOTA project that made you relevant. You declined to join the IOTA Foundation (twice) to work compensated alongside the army of researchers and engineers on Coordicide. We naturally respected this. Then we went out of our way to find some way to work professionally with you guys, not because we believe you have anything unique (random GIFs don't impress experienced researchers and engineers), but because we thought you to be valuable community contributors and dedicated developers, and we wanted to compensate that. We were met with demands of high sums based on literally GIFs; you wanted us to sign a contract without you having to disclose ANYTHING upfront. Then the unilateral NDA comes for a meeting that was intended to compare our approaches to discover whether there was synergy, so you and your brother's claims that you would of course not have proposed a unilateral NDA if both parties were going to display their approaches, is just a flat out lie. Just like your medium post today included lies about IOTA's board. You exploited the IOTA brand by renaming yourself to "IOTA Dev" and proclaiming to be "Tangle Researchers" and gaining a significant following based solely on this while behind the scenes you were circulating a pitch deck. In this secret pitch, you make false claims of having "better than IOTA" tech and talking about an entirely new token, all the while stringing the community along, accepting their donations, having them support your work under the guise of it being for IOTA. It is this betrayal that is the reason why the community is pissed off.
PatriQToday at 4:14 AM @Roman Semko Just in case you didn't see the above message by David
pvaldenegroToday at 4:17 AM @Roman Semko Hey Roman, its OK to make money, we all want to overcome the need to pay bills and just relax doing what we love. Those who do not get that are way lost. HOWEVER, and this is a real question. How would you feel if someone starts asking for contribution and donations to develop something that sounds like it could help the project backed by that community (i've read your entire twitter page like 5 times now, and it is without doubt a phishing move), and then come up with this NEW project that separates everything with a closed source approach? If you have no problem with that, i've (and many here) to review my judgement, because i really, really thought you shared the vision of empowering this ever growing project. Good luck on your projects, but don't do that again, it is a piece of shit move. You keep saying that IT WAS CLEAR FROM THE BEGGINING. Well my friend, i love to read, and from reading your posts, it is far from clear. Thank you anyway. This day has been interesting.
submitted by btlkhs to Iota [link] [comments]

SalesBrain Automated Instagram Chatbot

I love dropshipping. If gives regular Joes like you or I the opportunity to move high volumes of product without undertaking any of the inconvenient stuff like fullfillment, stock holding, merchant accounts etc.
So there's this software doing the rounds which I have been checking out. Its called SalesBrain and apparently its an instagram chat bot. I have some opinions after watching a couple of youtubers peddling this software.
One guy, who I won't mention because I am determined not to help propagate this, but if you Google Sales Brain there are only two youtubers talking about it. The one I refer to is the older of the two. Marginally older. This is a comment I left on his video.
8 and a half minutes of words without actually saying anything? A library of video's each saying the same thing as the last? The only other youtuber making videos about SalesBrain is in the same position. Talks with authority on a product for 5 or so videos without saying anything new. So what exactly am I getting at?
The fact is if this software was doing what these 'brand reps' are saying it will do, don't you realistically think more than 2 or 3 people would be talking about it? Seriously? THINK ABOUT IT.
It doesn't even make its own sub Reddit (only 2 or 3 mentions on Reddit - I get more mentions on Reddit than SalesBrain)? Yet its supposedly earning people $10k a month? Not for me bro.
Last time I saw a campaign like this it was for Binary Options? Remember that red hot niche?
Comprising of a magic piece of software which will do everything for you whilst you sleep? The lazy mans road to riches? Buy this software, switch it on, and sit back and count the money. Sound familiar?
A few (like, 1 or 2) youtubers making noise over a mysterious piece of software which (like the youtube videos themselves) disappear as quick as they arrived. Along with the money which the suckers 'invested'?
At this stage let me say with all sincerity, I am here to be proved wrong. If this stuff is doing what it says it can do tell the world? Shout it from the roof tops? I know I would. But no one is right? Its not new by any stretch of the imagination?
After dealing with Internet bullshit for almost 30 years I've seen it all before and I'm not buying SalesBrain.
Remember where you heard it first.
If you plan on opening up your instagram/shopify/paypal accounts to SalesBrain and its unknown administrators, who communicate ONLY through a message system which guarantees to destroy all message once read? I mean, good luck with that? There are other chatbots which will do similar things to what Sales Brain is supposed to do. With far less risk.
What would I do in your place? I mean an automated publicity draw which exposes you to thousands of insta accounts every week sounds cool right?
And thats easy. Look for social proof from tried and trusted sources. Google 'Instagram Automation 2019'. You will find lists and lists of the best chatbots (free and paid) all from trusted sources.
Whilst doing this I never had a single website, not 1, never, EVER, mention SalesBrain. Its either some exclusive shit? Or its a scam.
You're welcome.
submitted by GrampaGamerZ to dropship [link] [comments]

[uncensored-r/Bitcoin] /r/Bitcoin FAQ - Newcomers please read

The following post by BinaryResult is being replicated because some comments within the post(but not the post itself) have been silently removed.
The original post can be found(in censored form) at this link:
reddit: /Bitcoin/comments/6jlop4
The original post's content was as follows:

Welcome to the /Bitcoin Sticky FAQ

You've probably been hearing a lot about Bitcoin recently and are wondering what's the big deal? Most of your questions should be answered by the resources below but if you have additional questions feel free to ask them in the comments.
The following videos are a good starting point for understanding how bitcoin works and a little about its long term potential:
For lots of additional video resources check out the videos wiki page or /BitcoinTV.
Key properties of bitcoin
  • Limited Supply - There will only ever be 21,000,000 bitcoins created and they are issued in a predictable fashion, you can view the inflation schedule here. Once they are all issued Bitcoin will be truly deflationary.
  • Open source - Bitcoin code is fully auditable. You can read the source code yourself here.
  • Accountable - The public ledger is transparent, all transactions are seen by everyone.
  • Decentralized - Bitcoin is globally distributed across thousands of nodes with no single point of failure and as such can't be shut down similar to how Bittorrent works.
  • Censorship resistant - No one can prevent you from interacting with the bitcoin network and no one can censor, alter or block transactions that they disagree with, see Operation Chokepoint.
  • Push system - There are no chargebacks in bitcoin because only the person who owns the address where the bitcoins reside has the authority to move them.
  • Low fee - Transactions fees can vary between a few cents and a few dollars depending on network demand and how much priority you wish to assign to the transaction. Most wallets calculate the fee automatically but you can view current fees here.
  • Borderless - No country can stop it from going in/out, even in areas currently unserved by traditional banking as the ledger is globally distributed.
  • Trustless - Bitcoin solved the Byzantine's Generals Problem which means nobody needs to trust anybody for it to work.
  • Pseudonymous - No need to expose personal information when purchasing with cash or transacting.
  • Secure - Encrypted cryptographically and can’t be brute forced or confiscated with proper key management such as hardware wallets.
  • Programmable - Individual units of bitcoin can be programmed to transfer based on certain criteria being met
  • Nearly instant - From a few seconds to a few minutes depending on need for confirmations. After a few confirmations transactions are irreversible.
  • Peer-to-peer - No intermediaries with a cut, no need for trusted third parties.
  • Portable - Bitcoins are digital so they are easier to move than cash or gold. They can even be transported by simply remembering a string of words for wallet recovery.
  • Scalable - Each bitcoin is divisible down to 8 decimals allowing it to grow in value while still accommodating micro-transactions.
  • Designed Money - Bitcoin was created to fit all the fundamental properties of money better than gold or fiat
Some excellent writing on Bitcoin's value proposition and future can be found here. Bitcoin statistics can be found here, here and here. Developer resources can be found here and here. Peer-reviewed research papers can be found here. The number of times Bitcoin was declared dead by the media can be found here. Scaling resources here, and of course the whitepaper that started it all.

Where can I buy bitcoins?

BuyBitcoinWorldwide.com and Howtobuybitcoin.io are helpful sites for beginners. You can buy or sell any amount of bitcoin and there are several easy methods to purchase bitcoin with cash, credit card or bank transfer. Some of the more popular resources are below, also, check out the bitcoinity exchange resources for a larger list of options for purchases.
Bank Transfer Credit / Debit card Cash
Coinbase Coinbase LocalBitcoins
Gemini Bitstamp LibertyX
GDAX Bitit Mycelium LocalTrader
Bitstamp Cex.io BitQuick
Kraken CoinMama WallofCoins
Xapo BitcoinOTC
Cex.io
itBit
Bitit
Bitsquare
Here is a listing of local ATMs. If you would like your paycheck automatically converted to bitcoin use Cashila or Bitwage.
Note: Bitcoins are valued at whatever market price people are willing to pay for them in balancing act of supply vs demand. Unlike traditional markets, bitcoin markets operate 24 hours per day, 365 days per year. Preev is a useful site that that shows how much various denominations of bitcoin are worth in different currencies. Alternatively you can just Google "1 bitcoin in (your local currency)".

Securing your bitcoins

With bitcoin you can "Be your own bank" and personally secure your bitcoins OR you can use third party companies aka "Bitcoin banks" which will hold the bitcoins for you.
  • If you prefer to "Be your own bank" and have direct control over your coins without having to use a trusted third party, there are many software wallet options here. If you want easy and secure storage without having to learn computer security best practices, then a hardware wallet such as the Trezor or Ledger is recommended. A more advanced option is to secure them yourself using paper wallets generated offline. Some popular mobile and desktop options are listed below and most are cross platform.
Android iOs Desktop
Mycelium BreadWallet Electrum
CoPay AirBitz Armory
  • If you prefer to let third party "Bitcoin banks" manage your coins, try Coinbase or Xapo but be aware you may not be in control of your private keys in which case you would have to ask permission to access your funds and be exposed to third party risk.
Another interesting use case for physical storage/transfer is the Opendime. Opendime is a small USB stick that allows you to spend Bitcoin by physically passing it along so it's anonymous and tangible like cash.
Note: For increased security, use Two Factor Authentication (2FA) everywhere it is offered, including email!
2FA requires a second confirmation code to access your account, usually from a text message or app, making it much harder for thieves to gain access. Google Authenticator and Authy are the two most popular 2FA services, download links are below. Make sure you create backups of your 2FA codes.
Google Auth Authy
Android Android
iOS iOS

Where can I spend bitcoins?

A more comprehensive list can be found at the Trade FAQ but some more commons ones are below.
Store Product
Gyft Gift cards for hundreds of retailers including Amazon, Target, Walmart, Starbucks, Whole Foods, CVS, Lowes, Home Depot, iTunes, Best Buy, Sears, Kohls, eBay, GameStop, etc.
Steam, HumbleBundle, Games Planet, itch.io, g2g and kinguin For when you need to get your game on
Microsoft Xbox games, phone apps and software
Spendabit, The Bitcoin Shop, Overstock, Rakuten, DuoSearch, The Bitcoin Directory and BazaarBay Retail shopping with millions of results
ShakePay Generate one time use Visa cards in seconds
NewEgg, TigerDirect and Dell For all your electronics needs
Cashila, Bitwa.la, Coinbills, Piixpay, Bitbill.eu, Bylls, Coins.ph, Bitrefill, Pey.de, LivingRoomofSatoshi, Hyphen.to, Coinsfer, GetPaidinBitcoin, Coins.co.th, More #1, #2 Bill payment
Foodler, Menufy, Takeaway, Thuisbezorgd NL, Pizza For Coins Takeout delivered to your door!
Expedia, Cheapair, Lot, Destinia, BTCTrip, Abitsky, SkyTours, Fluege the Travel category on Gyft and 9flats For when you need to get away
BoltVM, BitHost VPS service
Cryptostorm, Mullvad, and PIA VPN services
Namecheap For new domain name registration
Stampnik and GetUSPS Discounted USPS Priority, Express, First-Class mail postage
Reddit Gold Premium membership which can be gifted to others
Coinmap, 99Bitcoins and AirBitz are helpful to find local businesses accepting bitcoins. A good resource for UK residents is at wheretospendbitcoins.co.uk.
There are also lots of charities which accept bitcoin donations, such as Wikipedia, Red Cross, Amnesty International, United Way, ACLU and the EFF. You can find a longer list here.

Merchant Resources

There are several benefits to accepting bitcoin as a payment option if you are a merchant;
  • 1-3% savings over credit cards or PayPal.
  • No chargebacks (final settlement in 10 minutes as opposed to 3+ months).
  • Accept business from a global customer base.
  • Increased privacy.
  • Convert 100% of the sale to the currency of your choice for deposit to your account, or choose to keep a percentage of the sale in bitcoin if you wish to begin accumulating it.
If you are interested in accepting bitcoin as a payment method, there are several options available;

Can I mine bitcoin?

Mining bitcoins can be a fun learning experience, but be aware that you will most likely operate at a loss. Newcomers are often advised to stay away from mining unless they are only interested in it as a hobby similar to folding at home. If you want to learn more about mining you can read more here. Still have mining questions? The crew at /BitcoinMining would be happy to help you out.
If you want to contribute to the bitcoin network by hosting the blockchain and propagating transactions you can run a full node using this setup guide. Bitseed is an easy option for getting set up. You can view the global node distribution here.

Earning bitcoins

Just like any other form of money, you can also earn bitcoins by being paid to do a job.
Site Description
WorkingForBitcoins, Bitwage, XBTfreelancer, Cryptogrind, Bitlancerr, Coinality, Bitgigs, /Jobs4Bitcoins, Rein Project Freelancing
OpenBazaar, Purse.io, Bitify, /Bitmarket, 21 Market Marketplaces
Watchmybit, Streamium.io, OTika.tv, XOtika.tv NSFW, /GirlsGoneBitcoin NSFW Video Streaming
Bitasker, BitforTip, WillPayCoin Tasks
Supload.com, SatoshiBox, JoyStream, File Army File/Image Sharing
CoinAd, A-ads, Coinzilla.io Advertising
You can also earn bitcoins by participating as a market maker on JoinMarket by allowing users to perform CoinJoin transactions with your bitcoins for a small fee (requires you to already have some bitcoins)

Bitcoin Projects

The following is a short list of ongoing projects that might be worth taking a look at if you are interested in current development in the bitcoin space.
Project Description
Lightning Network, Amiko Pay, and Strawpay Payment channels for network scaling
Blockstream and Drivechain Sidechains
21, Inc. Open source library for the machine payable web
ShapeShift.io Trade between bitcoins and altcoins easily
Open Transactions, Counterparty, Omni, Open Assets, Symbiont and Chain Financial asset platforms
Hivemind and Augur Prediction markets
Mirror Smart contracts
Mediachain Decentralized media library
Tierion and Factom Records & Titles on the blockchain
BitMarkets, DropZone, Beaver and Open Bazaar Decentralized markets
Samourai and Dark Wallet - abandoned Privacy-enhancing wallets
JoinMarket CoinJoin implementation (Increase privacy and/or Earn interest on bitcoin holdings)
Coinffeine and Bitsquare Decentralized bitcoin exchanges
Keybase and Bitrated Identity & Reputation management
Bitmesh and Telehash Mesh networking
JoyStream BitTorrent client with paid seeding
MORPHiS Decentralized, encrypted internet
Storj and Sia Decentralized file storage
Streamium and Faradam Pay in real time for on-demand services
Abra Global P2P money transmitter network
bitSIM PIN secure hardware token between SIM & Phone
Identifi Decentralized address book w/ ratings system
Coinometrics Institutional-level Bitcoin Data & Research
Blocktrail and BitGo Multisig bitcoin API
Bitcore Open source Bitcoin javascript library
Insight Open source blockchain API
Leet Kill your friends and take their money ;)

Bitcoin Units

One Bitcoin is quite large (hundreds of £/$/€) so people often deal in smaller units. The most common subunits are listed below:
Unit Symbol Value Info
millibitcoin mBTC 1,000 per bitcoin SI unit for milli i.e. millilitre (mL) or millimetre (mm)
microbitcoin ?BTC 1,000,000 per bitcoin SI unit for micro i.e microlitre (?L) or micrometre (?m)
bit bit 1,000,000 per bitcoin Colloquial "slang" term for microbitcoin
satoshi sat 100,000,000 per bitcoin Smallest unit in bitcoin, named after the inventor
For example, assuming an arbitrary exchange rate of $500 for one Bitcoin, a $10 meal would equal:
  • 0.02 BTC
  • 20 mBTC
  • 20,000 bits
For more information check out the Bitcoin units wiki.
Still have questions? Feel free to ask in the comments below or stick around for our weekly Mentor Monday thread. If you decide to post a question in /Bitcoin, please use the search bar to see if it has been answered before, and remember to follow the community rules outlined on the sidebar to receive a better response. The mods are busy helping manage our community so please do not message them unless you notice problems with the functionality of the subreddit. A complete list of bitcoin related subreddits can be found here
Note: This is a community created FAQ. If you notice anything missing from the FAQ or that requires clarification you can edit it here and it will be included in the next revision pending approval.
Welcome to the Bitcoin community and the new decentralized economy!
submitted by censorship_notifier to noncensored_bitcoin [link] [comments]

The Strange Birth & History of Monero, Part IV: Monero "as it is now"

You can read here part III.
You can read this whole story translated into Spanish here
This is part IV, the last but not least.
Monero - A secure, private, untreceable cryptocurrency
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.0
Notable comments in this thread:
-201: “I would like to offer 1000 MRO to the first person who creates a pool”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6422665#msg6422665)
[tacotime offers bounty to potential pool developer. Bytecoin devs haven’t released any code for pools, and the only existent pool, minergate (in the future related to BCN interests) was closed source]
-256: “Adam back seems to like CryptoNote the better than Zerocash https://twitter.com/adam3us/status/453493394472697856”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6440769#msg6440769)
-264: “update on pools: The NOMP guy (zone117x) is looking to fork his open source software and get a pool going, so one should hopefully be up soon.”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6441302#msg6441302)
-273: “Update on GUI: othe from VertCoin has notified me that he is working on it.”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6442606#msg6442606)
-356: “Everyone wanting a pool, please help raise a bounty with me here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=589533.0
And for the GUI:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=589561.0”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6461533#msg6461533)
[5439 MRO + 0.685 BTC + 5728555.555 BCN raised for pool and 1652 XMR, 121345.46695471 BCN for the GUI wallet. Though this wallet was "rejected" as official GUI because wallet still has to be polished before building a GUI]
-437: “Yes, most Windows users should see a higher hashrate with the new build. You can thank NoodleDoodle. ”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6481202#msg6481202)
-446: “Even faster Windows binaries have just been uploaded. Install for more hash power! Once again, it was NoodleDoodle.”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6483680#msg6483680)
-448: “that almost doubled my hashrate again! GREAT STUFF !!!”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6484109#msg6484109)
-461: “Noodle only started optimization today so there may be gains for your CPU in the future.”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6485247#msg6485247)
[First day of miner optimization by NoodleDoodle, it is only May 1st]
-706: “The unstoppable NoodleDoodle has optimized the Windows build again. Hashrate should more than double. Windows is now faster than Linux. :O”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6549444#msg6549444)
-753: “i here tft is no longer part of the project. so is he forking or relaunching bytecoin under new name and new parameters (merged mining with flatter emission curve.) also. what is the end consensus for the emission curve for monero. will it be adjusted."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6561345#msg6561345)
[May, 5th 2014. TFT is launching FANTOMCOIN, a clone coin which its "only" feature was merged mining]
-761: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6561941#msg6561941) [May, 5th 2014 – eizh on emission curve and tail emission]
-791: “As promised, I did Russian translation of main topic.”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6565521#msg6565521)
[one among dozens of decentralized and “altruist” collaborators of Monero in minor tasks]
-827: image
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6571652#msg6571652)
-853: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6575033#msg6575033)
[some are not happy that NoodleDoodle had only released the built binaries, but not the source code]
-950: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6593768#msg6593768)
[Rias, an account suspected to be related to the Bytecoin scam, dares to tag Monero as “instamine”]
-957: “It's rather bizarre that you're calling this an "instamine" scam when you're so fervently supporting BCN, which was mined 80% before entering the clearnet. Difficulty adjustments are per block, so there is no possibility of an instamine unless you don't publish your blockchain (emission is regular at the preset interval, and scales adequately with the network hash rate). What you're accusing monero of is exactly what ByteCoin did.”
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6594025#msg6594025
[Discussion with rias drags on for SEVERAL posts]
-1016: “There is no "dev team". There is a community of people working on various aspects of the coin.
I've been keeping the repo up to date. NoodleDoodle likes to optimise his miner. TFT started the fork and also assists when things break. othe's been working on a GUI. zone117x has been working on a pool.
It's a decentralized effort to maintain the fork, not a strawman team of leet hackers who dwell in the underbellies of the internet and conspire for instamines.”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6596828#msg6596828)
-1023: “Like I stated in IRC, I am not part of the "dev team", I never was. Just so happens I took a look at the code and changed some extremely easy to spot "errors". I then decided to release the binary because I thought MRO would benefit from it. I made this decision individually and nobody else should be culpable”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6597057#msg6597057)
[Noodledoodle gets rid of the instaminer accusations]
-1029: “I decided to relaunch Monero so it will suit all your wishes that you had: flatter emission curve, open source optimized miner for everybody from the start, no MM with BCN/BMR and the name. New Monero will be ready tomorrow”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6597252#msg6597252)
[people trying to capitalize mistakes is always there.]
-1030: "Pull request has been submitted and merged to update miner speed
It appears from the simplicity of the fix that there may have been deliberate crippling of the hashing algorithm from introduction with ByteCoin."
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6597460#msg6597460
[tacotime “officially” raises suspects of possible voluntarily crippled miner]
-1053: "I don't mind the 'relaunch' or the merge-mining fork or any other new coin at all. It's inevitable that the CryptoNote progresses like scrypt into a giant mess of coins. It's not undesirable or 'wrong'. Clones fighting out among themselves is actually beneficial for Monero. Although one of them is clearly unserious and trolling by choosing the same name.
Anyway, this sudden solidarity with BCN or TFT sure is strange when none of these accounts were around for the discussions that took place 3 weeks ago. Such vested interests with no prior indications. Hmm...? "
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6599013#msg6599013
[eizh points out the apparent organized fudding]
-1061: "There was no takeover. The original developer (who himself did a fork of bytecoin and around a dozen lines of code changes) was non-responsive and had disappeared. The original name had been cybersquatted all over the place (since the original developer did not even register any domain name much less create a web site), making it impossible to even create a suitably named web site. A bunch of us who didn't want to see the coin die who represented a huge share of the hash power and ownership of the coin decided to adopt it. We reached out to the original developer to participate in this community effort and he still didn't respond over 24 hours, so we decided to act to save the coin from neglect and actively work toward building the coin."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6599798#msg6599798)
[smooth defends legitimacy of current “dev team” and decisions taken]
-1074: “Zerocash will be announced soon (May 18 in Oakland? but open source may not be ready then?).
Here is a synopsis of the tradeoffs compared to CyptoNote: […]"
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6602891#msg6602891)
[comparison among Zerocash y Cryptonote]
-1083: "Altcoin history shows that except in the case of premine (Tenebrix), the first implementation stays the largest by a wide margin. We're repeating that here by outpacing Bytecoin (thanks to its 80% mine prior to surfacing). No other CN coin has anywhere near the hashrate or trading volume. Go check diff in Fantom for example or the lack of activity in BCN trading.
The only CN coin out there doing something valuable is HoneyPenny, and they're open source too. If HP develops something useful, MRO can incorporate it as well. Open source gives confidence. No need for any further edge."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6603452#msg6603452)
[eizh reminds everyone the “first mover” advantage is a real advantage]
-1132: "I decided to tidy up bitmonero GitHub rep tonight, so now there is all valuable things from latest BCN commits & Win32. Faster hash from quazarcoin is also there. So BMR rep is the freshest one.
I'm working on another good feature now, so stay tuned."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6619738#msg6619738)
[first TFT apparition in weeks, he somehow pretends to still be the "lead dev"]
-1139: "This is not the github or website used by Monero. This github is outdated even with these updates. Only trust binaries from the first post."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6619971#msg6619971)
[eizh tries to clarify the community, after tft interference, which are the official downloads]
-1140: “The faster hash is from NoodleDoodle and is already submitted to the moner-project github (https://github.com/monero-project/bitmonero) and included in the binaries here.
[trying to bring TFT back on board] It would be all easier if you just work together with the other guys, whats the problem? Come to irc and talk like everyone else?
[on future monero exchangers] I got confirmation from one."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6619997#msg6619997)
[8th may 2014, othe announces NoodleDoodle optimized miner is now open source, asks TFT to collaborate and communicates an exchanger is coming]
-1146: "I'll be impressed if they [BCN/TFT shills] manage to come up with an account registered before January, but then again they could buy those.”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6620257#msg6620257)
[smooth]
-1150: “Ring signatures mean that when you sign a transaction to spend an output (coins), no one looking at the block chain can tell whether you signed it or one of the other outputs you choose to mix in with yours. With a mixing factor of 5 or 10 after several transactions there are millions of possible coins all mixed together. You get "anonymity" and mixing without having to use a third party mixer.”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6620433#msg6620433)
[smooth answering to “what are ring signatures” in layman terms]
-1170: "Someone (C++ skilled) did private optimized miner a few days ago, he got 74H/s for i5 haswell. He pointed that mining code was very un-optimized and he did essential improvements for yourself. So, high H/S is possible yet. Can the dev's core review code for that?"
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6623136#msg6623136)
[forums are talking about an individual or group of individuals with optimized miners - may 9th 2014]
-1230: "Good progress on the pool reported by NOMP dev zone117x. Stay tuned, everyone.
And remember to email your favorite exchanges about adding MRO."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6640190#msg6640190)
-1258: "This is actually as confusing to us as you. At one point, thankful_for_today said he was okay with name change: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=563821.msg6368600#msg6368600
Then he disappeared for more than a week after the merge mining vote failed.”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6645981#msg6645981)
[eizh on the TFT-issue]
-1358: “Jadehorse: registered on 2014-03-06 and two pages of one line posts:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=263597
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=263597;sa=showPosts
Trustnobody: registered on 2014-03-06 and two pages of one line posts:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=264292
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=264292;sa=showPosts
You guys should really just stop trying. It is quite transparent what you are doing. Or if you want to do it, do it somewhere else. Everyone else: ignore them please."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6666844#msg6666844)
[FUD campaign still ongoing, smooth battles it]
-1387: "The world’s first exchange for Monero just opened! cryptonote.exchange.to"
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6675902#msg6675902)
[David Latapie announces an important milestone: exchanger is here]
-1467: "image"
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6686125#msg6686125)
[it is weird, but tft appears again, apparently as if he were in a parallel reality]
-1495: “http://monero.cc/blog/monero-price-0-002-passed/”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6691706#msg6691706)
[“trading” milestone reached: monero surpassed for first time 0.002 btc price]
-1513: "There is one and only one coin, formerly called Bitmonero, now called Monero. There was a community vote in favor (despite likely ballot stuffing against). All of the major stakeholders at the time agreed with the rename, including TFT.
The code base is still called bitmonero. There is no reason to rename it, though we certainly could have if we really wanted to.
TFT said he he is sentimental about the Bitmonero name, which I can understand, so I don't think there is any malice or harm in him continuing to use it. He just posted the nice hash rate chart on here using the old name. Obviously he understands that they are one and the same coin."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6693615#msg6693615)
[Smooth clears up again the relation with TFT and BMR. Every time he appears it seems to generate confusion on newbies]
-1543: "Pool software is in testing now. You can follow the progress on the pool bounty thread (see original post on this thread for link)."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6698097#msg6698097)
-1545: "[on the tail emission debate] I've been trying to raise awareness of this issue. The typical response seems to be, "when Bitcoin addresses the problem, so will we." To me this means it will never be addressed. The obvious solution is to perpetually increase the money supply, always rewarding miners with new coins.
Tacotime mentioned a hard fork proposal to never let the block reward drop below 1 coin:
Code: if (blockReward < 1){ blockReward = 1; }
I assume this is merely delaying the problem, however. I proposed a fixed annual debasement (say 2%) with a tx fee cap of like 0.001% of the current block reward (or whatever sounds reasonable). That way we still get the spam protection without worrying about fee escalation down the road."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6698879#msg6698879)
[Johnny Mnemonic wants to debate tail emission. Debate is moved to the “Monero Economy” thread]
-1603: “My GOD,the wallet is very very wierd and too complicated to operate, Why dont release a wallet-qt as Bitcoin?”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6707857#msg6707857)
[Newbies have hard times with monero]
-1605: "because this coin is not a bitcoin clone and so there isnt a wallet-qt to just copy and release. There is a bounty for a GUI wallet and there is already an experimental windows wallet..."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6708250#msg6708250)
-1611: "I like this about Monero, but it seems it was written by cryptographers, not programmers. The damned thing doesn't even compile on Arch, and there are several bugs, like command history not working on Linux. The crypto ideas are top-notch, but the implementation is not."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6709002#msg6709002)
[Wolf0, a miner developer, little by little joining the community]
-1888: "http://198.199.79.100 (aka moneropool.org) successfully submitted a block. Miners will be paid for their work once payments start working.
P.S. This is actually our second block today. The first was orphaned. :/"
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6753836#msg6753836)
[May 16th: first pool block]
-1927: "Botnets aren't problem now. The main problem is a private hi-performance miner"
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6759622#msg6759622)
-1927: "Evidence?"
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6759661#msg6759661)
[smooth about the private optimized miner]
-1937: “[reference needed: smooth battling the weak evidence of optimized miner] Yes, I remember that. Some person on the Internet saying that some other unnamed person said he did something hardly constitutes evidence.
I'm not even doubting that optimized asm code could make a big difference. Just not sure how to know whether this is real or not. Rumors and FUD are rampant, so it is just hard to tell."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6760040#msg6760040)
[smooth does not take the "proof" seriously]
-1949: "image
One i5 and One e5 connected to local pool:
image"
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6760624#msg6760624)
[proof of optimized miner]
-1953: "lazybear are you interested in a bounty to release the source code (maybe cleaned up a bit?) your optimized miner? If not, I'll probably play around with the code myself tomorrow and see if I can come up with something, or maybe Noodle Doodle will take an interest."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6760699#msg6760699)
[smooth tries to bring lazybear and his optimized miner on board]
-1957: "smooth, NoodleDoodle just said on IRC his latest optimizations are 4x faster on Windows. Untested on Linux so far but he'll push the source to the git repo soon. We'll be at 1 million network hashrate pretty soon."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6760814#msg6760814)
[eizh makes publics NoodleDoodle also has more miner optimizations ready]
-1985: “Someone (not me) created a Monero block explorer and announced it yesterday in a separate thread:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=611561.0”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6766206#msg6766206)
[May 16th, 2014: a functional block explorer]
-2018: “Noodle is doing some final tests on Windows and will begin testing on Linux. He expects hashrate should increase across all architectures. I can confirm a 5x increase on an i7 quad-core + Windows 7 64-bit.
Please be patient. These are actual changes to the program, not just a switch that gets flicked on. It needs testing.”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6770093#msg6770093)
[eizh has more info on last miner optimization]
-2023: “Monero marketcap is around $300,000 as of now”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6770365#msg6770365)
-2059: I was skeptical of this conspiracy theory at first but after thinking about the numbers and looking back at the code again, I'm starting to believe it.
These are not deep optimizations, just cleaning up the code to work as intended.
At 100 H/s, with 500k iterations, 70 cycles per L3 memory access, we're now at 3.5 GHz which is reasonably close. So the algorithm is finally memory-bound, as it was originally intended to be. But as delivered by the bytecode developers not even close.
I know this is going to sound like tooting our own horn but this is another example of the kind of dirty tricks you can expect from the 80% premine crowd and the good work being done in the name of the community by the Monero developers.
Assuming they had the reasonable, and not deoptimized, implementation of the algorithm as designed all along (which is likely), the alleged "two year history" of bytecoin was mined on 4-8 PCs. It's really one of the shadiest and sleaziest premines scams yet, though this shouldn't be surprising because in every type of scam, the scams always get sneakier and more deceptive over time (the simple ones no longer work)."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6773168#msg6773168)
[smooth blowing the lid: if miner was so de-optimized, then BCN adoption was even lower than initially thought]
-2123: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6781481#msg6781481)
[fluffypony first public post in Monero threads]
-2131: "moneropool.org is up to 2KHs, (average of 26Hs per user). But that's still only 0.3% of the reported network rate of 575Khs.
So either a large botnet is mining, or someone's sitting quietly on a much more efficient miner and raking in MRO."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6782192#msg6782192)
[with pools users start to notice that “avg” users account for a very small % of the network hashrate, either botnets or a super-optimized miner is mining monero]
-2137: “I figure its either:
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6782852#msg6782852)
-2192: “New source (0.8.8.1) is up with optimizations in the hashing. Hashrate should go up ~4x or so, but may have CPU architecture dependence. Windows binaries are up as well for both 64-bit and 32-bit."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6788812#msg6788812)
[eizh makes official announce of last miner optimization, it is may 17th]
-2219: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6792038#msg6792038)
[wolf0 is part of the monero community for a while, discussing several topics as botnet mining and miner optimizations. Now spots security flaws in the just launched pools]
-2301: "5x optimized miner released, network hashrate decreases by 10% Make your own conclusions. :|"
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6806946#msg6806946)
-2323: "Monero is on Poloniex https://poloniex.com/exchange/btc_mro"
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6808548#msg6808548)
-2747: "Monero is holding a $500 logo contest on 99designs.com now: https://99designs.com/logo-design/contests/monero-mro-cryptocurrency-logo-design-contest-382486"
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6829109#msg6829109)
-2756: “So... ALL Pools have 50KH/s COMBINED.
Yet, network hash is 20x more. Am i the only one who thinks that some people are insta mining with prepared faster miners?”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6829977#msg6829977)
-2757: “Pools aren't stable yet. They are more inefficient than solo mining at the moment. They were just released. 10x optimizations have already been released since launch, I doubt there is much more optimization left.”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6830012#msg6830012)
-2765: “Penalty for too large block size is disastrous in the long run.
Once MRO value increases a lot, block penalties will become more critical of an issue. Pools will fix this issue by placing a limit on number and size of transactions. Transaction fees will go up, because the pools will naturally accept the most profitable transactions. It will become very expensive to send with more than 0 mixin. Anonymity benefits of ring signatures are lost, and the currency becomes unusable for normal transactions.”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6830475#msg6830475)
-2773: "The CryptoNote developers didn't want blocks getting very large without genuine need for it because it permits a malicious attack. So miners out of self-interest would deliberately restrict the size, forcing the network to operate at the edge of the penalty-free size limit but not exceed it. The maximum block size is a moving average so over time it would grow to accommodate organic volume increase and the issue goes away. This system is most broken when volume suddenly spikes."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6830710#msg6830710)
-3035: "We've contributed a massive amount to the infrastructure of the coin so far, enough to get recognition from cryptonote, including optimizing their hashing algorithm by an order of magnitude, creating open source pool software, and pushing several commits correcting issues with the coin that eventually were merged into the ByteCoin master. We also assisted some exchange operators in helping to support the coin.
To say that has no value is a bit silly... We've been working alongside the ByteCoin devs to improve both coins substantially."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6845545#msg6845545)
[tacotime defends the Monero team and community of accusations of just “ripping-off” others hard-work and “steal” their project]
-3044: "image"
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6845986#msg6845986)
[Monero added to coinmarketcap may 21st 2014]
-3059: "You have no idea how influential you have been to the success of this coin. You are a great ambassador for MRO and one of the reasons why I chose to mine MRO during the early days (and I still do, but alas no soup for about 5 days now)."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6846509#msg6846509)
[random user thanks smooth CONSTANT presence, and collaboration. It is not all FUD ;)]
-3068: "You are a little too caught up in the mindset of altcoin marketing wars about "unique features" and "the team" behind the latest pump and dump scam.
In fact this coin is really little more than BCN without the premine. "The team" is anyone who contributes code, which includes anyone contributing code to the BCN repository, because that will get merged as well (and vice-versa).
Focus on the technology (by all accounts amazing) and the fact that it was launched in a clean way without 80% of the total world supply of the coin getting hidden away "somewhere." That is the unique proposition here. There also happens to be a very good team behind the coin, but anyone trying too hard to market on the basis of some "special" features, team, or developer is selling you something. Hold on to your wallet."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6846638#msg6846638)
[An answer to those trolls saying Monero has no innovation/unique feature]
-3070: "Personally I found it refreshing that Monero took off WITHOUT a logo or a gui wallet, it means the team wasn't hyping a slick marketing package and is concentrating on the coin/note itself."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6846676#msg6846676)
-3119: “image
[included for the lulz]
-3101: "[…]The main developers are tacotime, smooth, NoodleDoodle. Some needs are being contracted out, including zone117x, LucasJones, and archit for the pool, another person for a Qt GUI, and another person independently looking at the code for bugs."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6848006#msg6848006)
[the initial "core team" so far, eizh post]
-3123: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6850085#msg6850085)
[fluffy steps-in with an interesting dense post. Don’t dare to skip it, worthwhile reading]
-3127: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6850526#msg6850526)
[fluffy again, worth to read it too, so follow link, don’t be lazy]
-3194: "Hi guys - thanks to lots of hard work we have added AES-NI support to the slow_hash function. If you're using an AES-NI processor you should see a speed-up of about 30%.”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6857197#msg6857197)
[flufflypony is now pretty active in the xmr topic and announces a new optimization to the crippled miner]
-3202: "Whether using pools or not, this coin has a lot of orphaned blocks. When the original fork was done, several of us advised against 60 second blocks, but the warnings were not heeded.
I'm hopeful we can eventually make a change to more sane 2- or 2.5-minute blocks which should drastically reduce orphans, but that will require a hard fork, so not that easy."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6857796#msg6857796)
[smooth takes the opportunity to remember the need of bigger target block]
-3227: “Okay, optimized miner seems to be working: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=619373”
[wolf0 makes public his open source optimized miner]
-3235: "Smooth, I agree block time needs to go back to 2 minutes or higher. I think this and other changes discussed (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=597878.msg6701490#msg6701490) should be rolled into a single hard fork and bundled with a beautiful GUI wallet and mining tools."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6861193#msg6861193)
[tail emission, block target and block size are discussed in the next few messages among smooth, johnny and others. If you want to know further about their opinions/reasonings go and read it]
-3268: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6862693#msg6862693)
[fluffy dares another user to bet 5 btc that in one year monero will be over dash in market cap. A bet that he would have lost as you can see here https://coinmarketcap.com/historical/20150524/ even excluding the 2M “instamined” coins]
-3283: "Most of the previous "CPU only" coins are really scams and the developers already have GPU miner or know how to write one. There are a very few exceptions, almost certainly including this one.
I don't expect a really dominant GPU miner any time soon, maybe ever. GPUs are just computers though, so it is certainly possible to mine this on a GPU, and there probably will be a some GPU miner, but won't be so much faster as to put small scale CPU miners out of business (probably -- absent some unknown algorithmic flaw).
Everyone focuses on botnets because it has been so long since regular users were able to effectively mine a coin (due to every coin rapidly going high end GPU and ASIC) that the idea that "users" could vastly outnumber "miners" (botnet or otherwise) isn't even on the radar.
The vision here is a wallet that asks you when you want to install: "Do you want to devote some of you CPU power to help secure the network. You will be eligible to receive free coins as a reward (recommended) [check box]." Get millions of users doing that and it will drive down the value of mining to where neither botnets nor professional/industrial miners will bother, and Satoshi's original vision of a true p2p currency will be realized.
That's what cryptonote wants to accomplish with this whole "egalitarian mining" concept. Whether it succeeds I don't know but we should give it a chance. Those cryptonote guys seem pretty smart. They've probably thought this through better than any of us have."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6863720#msg6863720)
[smooth vision of a true p2p currency]
-3318: "I have a screen shot that was PMed to me by someone who paid a lot of money for a lot of servers to mine this coin. He won't be outed by me ever but he does in fact exist. Truth."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6865061#msg6865061)
[smooth somehow implies it is not botnets but an individual or a group of them renting huge cloud instances]
-3442: "I'm happy to report we've successfully cracked Darkcoin's network with our new quantum computers that just arrived from BFL, a mere two weeks after we ordered them."
[fluffy-troll]
-3481: “Their slogan is, "Orphaned Blocks, Bloated Blockchain, that's how we do""
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6878244#msg6878244)
[Major FUD troll in the topic. One of the hardest I’ve ever seen]
-3571: "Tacotime wanted the thread name and OP to use the word privacy instead of anonymity, but I made the change for marketing reasons. Other coins do use the word anonymous improperly, so we too have to play the marketing game. Most users will not bother looking at details to see which actually has more privacy; they'll assume anonymity > privacy. In a world with finite population, there's no such thing as anonymity. You're always "1 of N" possible participants.
Zero knowledge gives N -> everyone using the currency, ring signatures give N -> your choice, and CoinJoin gives N -> people who happen to be spending around the same amount of money as you at around the same time. This is actually the critical weakness of CoinJoin: the anonymity set is small and it's fairly susceptible to blockchain analysis. Its main advantage is that you can stick to Bitcoin without hard forking.
Another calculated marketing decision: I made most of the OP about ring signatures. In reality, stealth addressing (i.e. one-time public keys) already provides you with 90% of the privacy you need. Ring signatures are more of a trump card that cannot be broken. But Bitcoin already has manual stealth addressing so the distinguishing technological factor in CryptoNote is the use of ring signatures.
This is why I think having a coin based on CoinJoin is silly: Bitcoin already has some privacy if you care enough. A separate currency needs to go way beyond mediocre privacy improvements and provide true indistinguishably. This is true thanks to ring signatures: you can never break the 1/N probability of guessing correctly. There's no additional circumstantial evidence like with CoinJoin (save for IP addresses, but that's a problem independent of cryptocurrencies)."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6883525#msg6883525)
[Anonymity discussions, specially comparing Monero with Darkcoin and its coinjoin-based solution, keep going on]
-3593: "Transaction fees should be a fixed percentage of the block reward, or at the very least not be controllable by the payer. If payers can optionally pay more then it opens the door for miner discrimination and tx fee bidding wars."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6886770#msg6886770)
[Johnny Mnemonic is a firm defender of fixed fees and tail emission: he see the “fee market” as big danger to the usability of cryptocurrencies]
-3986: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6930412#msg6930412)
[partnership with i2p]
-4373: “Way, way faster version of cpuminer: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=619373”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg6993812#msg6993812)
[super-optimized miner is finally leaked to the public. Now the hashrate is 100 times bigger than originally with crippled miner. The next hedge for "cloud farmers" is GPU mining]
-4877: “1. We have a logo! If you use Monero in any of your projects, you can grab a branding pack here. You can also see it in all its glory right here:
logo […] 4. In order to maintain ISO 4217 compliance, we are changing our ticker symbol from MRO to XMR effective immediately."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg7098497#msg7098497)
[Jun 2nd 2014]
-5079: “First GPU miner: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=638915.0”
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg7130160#msg7130160)
[4th June: Claymore has developed the first CryptoNight open source and publicly available GPU miner]
-5454: "New update to my miner - up to 25% hash increase. Comment and tell me how much of an increase you got from it: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=632724"
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg7198061#msg7198061)
[miner optimization is an endless task]
-5464: "I have posted a proposal for fixed subsidy:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=597878.msg7202538#msg7202538"
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg7202776#msg7202776)
[Nice charts and discussion proposed by tacotime, worth reading it]
-5658: "- New seed nodes added. - Electrum-style deterministic wallets have been added to help in the recovery of your wallet should you ever need to. It is enabled by default."
(https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg7234475#msg7234475)
[Now you can recover your wallet with a 24 word seed]
-5726: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg7240623#msg7240623)
[Bitcoin Pizza in monero version: a 2500 XMR picture sale (today worth ~$20k)]
-6905: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg7386715#msg7386715)
[Monero missives: CryptoNote peer review starts whitepaper reviewed)]
-7328: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg7438333#msg7438333)
[android monero widget built]
This is a dense digest of the first several thousand messages on the definitive Monero thread.
A lot of things happened in this stressful days and most are recorded here. It can be summarized in this:
  • 28th April: Othe and zone117x assume the GUI wallet and CN pools tasks.
  • 30th April: First NoodleDoodle's miner optimization.
  • 11th May: First Monero exchanger
  • 13th May: Open source pool code is ready.
  • 16th May: First pool mined block.
  • 19th May: Monero in poloniex
  • 20th May: Monero +1100 bitcoin 24h trading volume in Poloniex.
  • 21st May: New official miner optimization x4 speed (accumulated optimization x12-x16). Open source wolf0's CPU miner released.
  • 25th May: partnership with i2p
  • 28th May: The legendary super-optimized miner is leaked. Currently running x90 original speed. Hedge of the "cloud farmers" is over in the cpu mining.
  • 2nd June: Monero at last has a logo. Ticker symbol changes to the definitive XMR (former MRO)
  • 4th June: Claymore's open source GPU miner.
  • 10th June: Monero's "10,000 bitcoin pizza" (2500 XMR paintig). Deterministic seed-based wallets (recover wallet with a 24 word seed)
  • March 2015 – tail emission added to code
  • March 2016 – monero hard forks to 2 min block and doubles block reward
There basically two things in here that can be used to attack Monero:
  • Crippled miner Gave unfair advantage to those brave enough to risk money and time to optimize and mine Monero.
  • Fast curve emission non-bitcoin-like curve as initially advertised and as it was widely accepted as suitable
Though we have to say two things to support current Monero community and devs:
  • The crippled miner was coded either by Bytecoin or CryptoNote, and 100% solved within a month by Monero community
  • The fast curve emission was a TFT miscalculation. He forgot to consider that as he was halving the block target he was unintentionally doubling the emission rate.
submitted by el_hispano to Monero [link] [comments]

Options trading websites,only legal brokers,no scum Fake Binary Option Review Websites II: BinaryToday Scam WHAT is BEST Binary Options Trading Platform in 2019? The Greatest Guide To Best binary option trading website ... Binary Options Price Action Strategy Best Binary Options Social Trading Platforms -Make Money With Binary Options Copy Trading Review Hedgestone Group: Trusted Binary Options Trading Site Binary options social trading - social trading bot review - scam or trusted? (what we know) ✔Best Australian Binary Options Trading and Brokers Websites by top10binary net Binary Options Trading Signals Free - Best Binary Options Signals Service Providers 2015

Trusted Binary Options Brokers. Without doing some research when you are looking to place and trade Binary Options online then you really are at the mercy of some of the poorly run and operated trading sites, with this in mind please do make sure that you have a look around our website for every single site listed has ticked all of the right boxes in regards to what they have to offer their ... Binary options trading may have gotten a bad rap because of its all-or-nothing premise, but the high payouts keep traders coming back for more. This is why binary options markets remain strong in various regions around the world, particularly in Asia. To avoid fraud in binary options trading, choose a trustworthy broker. These brokers can help minimize your losses and provide a measure of ... Over 50 Trusted Expert Reviews Safe And Secure Recommendations 150+ Years Industry Experience Author: Robert Sammut Trading Coach. Automated Trading Software. Updated Aug, 2020 1006 Views Today. It's not impossible to master binary trading, and like anything else, the more you put in, the more you will get out. To become good at making money, you'll need a great broker, time and some patience ... Binary Options Brokers Blacklist Binary options brokers help investors in making transaction for sale and purchase of assets in exchange as it is the special subspecies of all the options. However, do keep in mind this is a worldwide list, and some brokers may …. The most important styles of binary options are known as the coins-or-not anything binary alternative and the asset-or-nothing ... Binary options demo accounts are the best way to try both binary options trading, and specific brokers’ software and platforms – without needing to risk any money. You can get demo accounts at more than one broker, try them out and only deposit real money at the one you find best. It can also be useful to have accounts at more than one broker. For example, payouts for two different assets ... Trading binary options with 24options has been a nightmare for the past couple months. After denying my request for a withdrawal countless times, I was finally able to recover all my money with the help of an expert I read about online. Happy to share my experience and also to enlighten people on how I was able to get my money back. You can reach out to him on [email protected] gmail .c / o m" At US Binary Options our financial analysts have selected the top trusted US regulated binary platforms in 2017 and the best stock options brokers. binary options website for sale . From 2013, we compare and provide professional reviews on all binary trading platforms in order to help you choose the broker that suits you best Top 10 Binary Options Brokers websites by TradersBible for this year ...

[index] [2617] [15374] [26574] [799] [20407] [2656] [10741] [16070] [19713] [13990]

Options trading websites,only legal brokers,no scum

Trusted Binary Robot Our system is exceptionally user-friendly and allows you to place trades with an advantage! When your account is set up, you are good to go. Most binary trading robots are not ... Read our trusted reviews of the Top Rated Binary Options Signals providers of 2015 Monitoring all the binary options markets is requires much time and knowledge of binary Options trading which ... Fake Review Websites in Binary Options PART 1 - Duration: 10:27. The Binary Bears 889 views. 10:27 . Signal Push shuts down - Duration: 5:41. The Binary Bears 843 views. 5:41. 5 MINUTE STRATEGY ON ... If you are really serious about trading binary options, then, don’t waste your time talking to other brokers. I am giving you a short-cut to a reliable broker, because I have been trading with ... Our Website Here: https://bit.ly/2D8MSX6 - The Greatest Guide To Best binary option trading website auto trader : Trusted & Safe Upgraded Jul, 2020 1071 View... Binary Options - When to Enter Trades - Duration: 7:44. Pope Binary 573,699 views. 7:44 . Best Price Action Trading Strategy That Will Change The Way You Trade - Duration: 10:17. Wysetrade ... Do you want to know the best websites and services for binary options copy trading. Trading santai binary hasilkan profit yang luar biasa besar dan konsisten. Translated titles: Plataformas de ... Binary Options Trading से क्या लाखों रूपये कमाये जा सकते है ? Exposed Aryaamoney - Duration: 8:24. AryaaMoney 343,931 views Best binary options social trading platforms -make money with binary options copy trading review. Binary robot robot binary option prosignal binary options software that works . Trustful sites for traders and a detailed list of dangerous brokers. If you are trading binary options, then do it on a reliable trading platform. To make money on binary options it's important to ...

https://binaryoptiontrade.propverbdidsroppei.tk